C4040-122 exam Dumps Source : Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2
Test Code : C4040-122
Test designation : Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2
Vendor designation : IBM
: 76 real Questions
Can I find real of C4040-122 exam?
extraordinary!, I disdainful to study along with your C4040-122 QA and software program. Your software helped me lots in preparingmy IBM checks.
got no hassle! three days coaching concurrent C4040-122 today's dumps is required.
i am C4040-122 certified now, artery to this killexams.com internet website online. They acquire a extremely worthy string of braindumps and exam practise assets, I substantially applied them for my C4040-122 certification remaining year, and this time their sftuff is virtually as authentic. The questions are real, and the trying out engine works amazing. No issues detected. I just ordered it, practiced for every week or so, then went in and handed the C4040-122 exam. This is what an confiscate exam preparation must be enjoy for everyone, I endorse killexams.
I need actual test questions of C4040-122 exam.
I am C4040-122 licensed now, artery to this killexams.com website. They acquire a awesome collection of braindumps and exam practise sources, I extensively utilized them for my C4040-122 certification remaining year, and this time their sftuff is simply as accurate. The questions are real, and the exam simulator works exceptional. No issues detected. I just ordered it, practiced for per week or so, then went in and passed the C4040-122 exam. This is what the consummate exam preparation must be enjoy for low of us, I advise killexams.
best to pay attention that actual test questions of C4040-122 examination are available.
i bought this because of the C4040-122 questions, I concept I should enact the QAs factor simply primarily based on my previous experience. Yet, the C4040-122 questions provided through killexams.com had been simply as beneficial. So you really need focused prep material, I passed without difficulty, low manner to killexams.com.
it's miles unbelieveable, however C4040-122 actual test questions are availabe birthright here.
the quickly solutions made my instruction more convenient. I completed seventy five questions out off eighty well beneaththe stipulated time and managed 80%. My aspiration to be a certified occupy the exam C4040-122. I got the killexams.com manual simply 2 weeks earlier than the exam. thanks.
wherein can i locate C4040-122 real occupy a determine at questions questions?
I practically misplaced confidence in me within the wake of falling flat the C4040-122 exam.I scored 87% and cleared this exam. tons obliged killexams.com for getting better my truth. topics in C4040-122 acquire been genuinely tough for me to procure it. I practically surrendered the design to occupy this exam low over again. besides because of my accomplice who prescribed me to disburse killexams.com Questions & answers. inner a compass of simple four weeks i was absolutely prepared for this exam.
strive out those actual C4040-122 questions.
For entire C4040-122 career certifications, there may be masses of statistics available online. but, i used to be hesitant to applyC4040-122 free braindumps as individuals who placed these things on-line enact no longer sense any responsibility and reclaim updeceptive info. So, I paid for the killexams.com C4040-122 q and a and couldnt be happier. its far actual that they near up withreal exam questions and solutions, that is how it changed into for me. I passed the C4040-122 exam and didnt even strain about it an abominable lot. Very frosty and dependable.
Real Q & A of C4040-122 exam are Awesome!
I had taken the C4040-122 preparation from the killexams.com as that was a nice platform for the preparation and that had ultimately given me the best even of the preparation to procure the best scores in the C4040-122 test exams. I really enjoyed the artery I got the things done in the spicy artery and through the attend of the same; I had finally got the thing on the line. It had made my preparation much easier and with the attend of the killexams.com I had been able to grow well in the life.
simply try these dumps and success is yours.
The association time for C4040-122 exam halt up certainly a nice smack for me. Effectively passing, i acquire located outthe artery to light low of the similarly stages. Due to killexams.com Questions & answers for low of the help. I had limited time for preparation but killexams.com brain dumps acquire become out to be a assist for me. It had vast questions and answers that made me design in a short compass.
simply attempt those actual test questions and fulfillment is yours.
I passed the C4040-122 exam thanks to killexams.com, too. worthy to understand Im not alone! that is a fanciful artery to prepare for IT test. i was concerned identification fail, so I ordered this package. The exam simulator runs very smoothly, so I ought to exercise inside the exam surroundings for hours, using real exam questions and checking my solutions. As a result, I knew pretty tons the all lot at the exam, which become the quality Christmas and recent yr present I may want to supply myself!
massive Blue's refresh contains the gargantuan vigour 795, which it pits in opposition t proper-shelf systems from HP and Oracle.
IBM Corp. final week refreshed its gadget p server line with several recent POWER7-primarily based programs. The most recent POWER7 entries won't ship except September 17.
they may probably be worth the wait. huge Blue's revamped system p line comprises the gargantuan 256-method verve 795, which IBM pits at once in opposition t properly-shelf choices from Hewlett-Packard Co. (HP) and Oracle Corp.
big Blue is never simply considering big, however: it additionally unveiled 4 gadget p "categorical" entries -- i.e., smaller, much less-costly systems slated for the mid-market. IBM's POWER7 push additionally comprises a dedicated system -- viz., the sage Analytics device 7700 -- designed for company intelligence (BI) and records warehousing workloads. or not it's of a chunk with the smart Analytics initiative that massive Blue kicked off ultimate summer season, simply prior to its acquisition of analytics powerhouse SPSS Inc.
IBM's 256-core vigour 795 plays to system p's (and RISC/Unix's) tolerable strengths, and its smaller categorical entries -- the verve 710, 720, 730, and 740 systems -- comprise massive Blue's newest application to grapple with commodity x86 (or x64, as is universally the case) servers working chips from superior Micro devices (AMD) Inc. and Intel Corp. up to now, huge Blue had provided handiest a solitary power-based categorical gadget, the power 720.
during this case, huge Blue is making a stake that a a worthy deal lessen saturate (enabled in fragment by using POWER7 chips that might otherwise were discarded) in addition to an capability to race AIX, device i and Linux workloads will aid tip the scales in gadget p's favor. moreover, with POWER7, IBM is once once again fielding a 2U form-ingredient server -- really, two 2U form-element servers, the verve 710 and the energy 730. Add low of it up and you acquire what feels enjoy a worthy application to tackle the commodity server section -- a historically tough section to crack.
In an trade it's relocating to commoditization (and relentlessly, at that), IBM Corp. is sticking to its proprietary guns.
To fabricate sure, large Blue is a creditable commodity participant -- its device x hardware line is powered by using chips from each AMD and Intel; its paraphernalia x BladeCenter portfolio (which comprises a power-based offering) is not any. 2, universal, behind HP -- however likewise remains dedicated to homegrown silicon efforts similar to POWER7, which powers (in one form or a different) its device i, paraphernalia p, and system z hardware traces.
In a way, massive Blue's POWER7 CMOS now stands as the eventual of the Credible x86 alternate options.
HP and Intel continue to invest in IA64 (which is in response to an EPIC structure); Oracle has said lots of the birthright issues about SPARC (which has having said that been hemorrhaging relevance for half a decade or greater); and different gamers (equivalent to Fujitsu and Unisys Corp.) push their personal proprietary CMOS flavors, however zero can factor to the type of profits performance (relative to sales of competitive, non-commodity systems) that IBM can.
It seems that greater and faster transistors product of graphene aren't low that IBM is working on, considering that its recent press free up speaks of a recent set of POWER7 servers for worrying emerging functions.
notwithstanding not definitely concentrated on the customer market, IBM is one in every of greatest names on the business, industry and industrial sectors as far as computing goes.
It has a huge portfolio of machine for each current and rising functions, with monetary services, scientific analysis and healthcare management being just a few of its outlets.
What the company did most recently become carry a recent batch of enhanced POWER7 blades and servers, which are additionally worthy for consolidation and virtualization.
"Our strategy looks to be paying off as further and further valued clientele opt for power techniques," said Tom Rosamilia, well-known supervisor of IBM power and z methods.
One product is the 16-core, single-wide IBM BladeCenter PS703, which will furthermore be a substitute for sprawling racks and is decent for people worried with power effectivity.
The BladeCenter PS704 is corresponding to its sibling above, handiest it has double the volume of cores and, for this reason, 60-% quicker performance within the identical house requirements as old-technology POWER7 products.
The announcement furthermore mentions the upgraded IBM power 750 express and the stronger energy 755, both with 32 POWER7 cores now.
"we are working billions of strict calculations in line with Einstein's credence of relativity on the POWER7 blades," talked about Gaurav Khanna, professor of physics at UMass-Dartmouth.
"running POWER7, i'm in a position to procure consequences as lots as eight times faster than working the equal calculations on an Intel Xeon processor. Calculations that used to occupy a month to race at the flash are finished in less than a week. This capability that i can enact eight times extra science within the equal timeframe than I may enact earlier than."
This web page should acquire assistance on anything involving IBMs smarter computing initiative.
Feb 22, 2010
IBM announced recent POWER7 methods, designed to manage probably the most stressful emerging functions, ranging from smart electrical grids to true-time analytics for fiscal markets. the brand recent methods accommodate applied sciences for the really worthy calls for of latest applications and features that reckon on processing gigantic numbers of concurrent transactions and statistics while analyzing that information in real time. furthermore, the recent systems enable consumers to manage latest functions and services at less saturate with expertise breakthroughs in virtualization, power reductions, greater most economical disburse of reminiscence, and stronger cost efficiency.
The techniques had been launched with the Linux, AIX, and IBM i operating paraphernalia guide. the recent programs and management utility comprise the IBM verve 780, a brand recent class of scalable, high-conclusion servers, that includes an superior modular design with as much as 64 POWER7 "cores," or CPUs, and the recent TurboCore workload optimizing mode. TurboCore can convey up to 2 instances the performance per core of POWER6 processor-primarily based programs, presenting mighty ROI for purposes with immoderate per-core efficiency requirements, comparable to managing and analyzing transactions from a sensible electrical grid.
The IBM energy 770 is a modular commercial enterprise device with as much as sixty four POWER7 cores, featuring higher efficiency per core than POWER6 processors and the disburse of up to 70% much less power for the identical variety of cores because the IBM power 570. IBM energy 755, a excessive-performance computing cluster node with 32 POWER7 cores, is power celebrity-certified for energy efficiency, and optimized for the most challenging analytic workloads. additionally, the IBM vigour 750 express, an energy vast name-certified industry server for mid-market purchasers, offers 4 times the processing potential of its predecessor, the IBM verve 550 express, in the identical energy envelope and 10 times the efficiency of a similar HP Integrity rx6600.
IBM systems Director specific, proper and enterprise editions tender recent packaging of administration utility for the brand recent techniques and encompass the superior virtualization administration capabilities of VMControl, which helps a "programs pool" of diverse verve servers to be managed as one entity.
The vigour 750 specific and 755 are transport, and the energy 770 and 780 planned quantity availability is March 16. The IBM techniques Director editions, supporting each POWER7 and POWER6 fashions, will ship on March 5, IBM says. For greater tips about power systems, Go here.
While it is difficult errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals procure sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater fragment of other's sham report objection customers near to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. They never bargain on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Extraordinarily they deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report grievance, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you notice any unfounded report posted by their rivals with the designation killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protestation or something enjoy this, simply recall there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of worthy administrations because of their advantages. There are a noteworthy many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their illustration questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
000-602 bootcamp | ED0-001 rehearse test | 000-R09 mock exam | C2040-440 cram | 000-M60 free pdf | HP0-S25 dumps questions | HP0-719 study guide | 000-585 dumps | ST0-130 rehearse Test | E22-214 exam prep | C2070-981 rehearse questions | 850-001 real questions | C2020-605 brain dumps | 000-911 free pdf | 000-631 free pdf | HP0-S45 study guide | 840-425 questions and answers | 1Z0-034 questions and answers | C2090-614 questions answers | EW0-200 test prep |
Simply contemplate these IBM C4040-122 Questions and Pass the real test
killexams.com provide latest and up to date Pass4sure rehearse Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for brand recent syllabus of IBM C4040-122 Exam. rehearse their real Questions and Answers to improve your information and pass your exam with elevated Marks. They guarantee your pass within the Test Center, covering every one of the topics of exam and improve your information of the C4040-122 exam. Pass without any doubt with their actual questions.
You should procure the recently updated IBM C4040-122 Braindumps with the actual answers, which are prepared via killexams.com experts, allowing the candidates to comprehend expertise about their C4040-122 exam path in the maximum, you will not find C4040-122 merchandise of such nice anywhere in the marketplace. Their IBM C4040-122 rehearse Dumps are given to applicants at acting a hundred% of their exam. Their IBM C4040-122 exam dumps are cutting-edge in the marketplace, giving you a chance to reclaim together in your C4040-122 exam inside the proper manner.
If you are interested in effectively Passing the IBM C4040-122 exam to start earning? killexams.com has leading side developed Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2 exam questions so one can fabricate positive you pass this C4040-122 exam! killexams.com offers you the maximum correct, recent and updated C4040-122 exam questions and available with a 100% money back assure guarantee. There are many organizations that provide C4040-122 brain dumps but those arent redress and modern ones. Preparation with killexams.com C4040-122 recent questions is a first-class manner to pass this certificationexam in elevated marks.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as underneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for low tests on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for low Orders
We are low well awake that a main hassle in the IT industry is that there is a loss of excellent braindumps. Their exam preparation material provides you everything you will want to occupy a certification exam. Their IBM C4040-122 Exam will provide you with exam questions with established answers that reflect the real exam. These questions and answers tender you with the devour of taking the real test. elevated best and cost for the C4040-122 Exam. 100% assure to pass your IBM C4040-122 exam and procure your IBM certification. They at killexams.com are devoted that will attend you pass your C4040-122 exam with elevated rankings. The probabilities of you failing your C4040-122 exam, after going through their comprehensive exam dumps are very little.
killexams.com acquire their specialists Team to guarantee their IBM C4040-122 exam questions are dependably the most recent. They are on the all extremely acquainted with the exams and testing focus.
How killexams.com preserve IBM C4040-122 exams updated?: they acquire their uncommon approaches to know the most recent exams data on IBM C4040-122. Now and then they contact their accomplices who are exceptionally snug with the testing focus or once in a while their clients will email us the latest input, or they got the most recent update from their dumps providers. When they determine the IBM C4040-122 exams changed then they updates them ASAP.
On the off chance that you truly near up short this C4040-122 Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2 and would prefer not to sit tense for the updates then they can give you plenary refund. however, you ought to transmit your score reply to us with the goal that they can acquire a check. They will give you plenary refund quickly amid their working time after they procure the IBM C4040-122 score report from you.
IBM C4040-122 Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2 Product Demo?: they acquire both PDF version and Testing Software. You can check their product page to perceive what it would loom that like.
At the point when will I procure my C4040-122 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment, your username/password are sent at your email address within 5 min. It may occupy microscopic longer if your bank delay in payment authorization.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for low exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for low Orders
C4040-122 Practice Test | C4040-122 examcollection | C4040-122 VCE | C4040-122 study guide | C4040-122 practice exam | C4040-122 cram
Killexams 000-347 rehearse test | Killexams HP2-H24 test prep | Killexams HP0-760 real questions | Killexams 70-473 free pdf download | Killexams HP2-H36 questions answers | Killexams 1Z0-545 braindumps | Killexams EE0-411 real questions | Killexams HP0-P19 exam prep | Killexams 99 rehearse questions | Killexams 500-651 questions and answers | Killexams MB2-719 dump | Killexams 9A0-046 dumps | Killexams VCPD510 study guide | Killexams QQ0-401 rehearse Test | Killexams 1Z0-858 dumps questions | Killexams M9560-670 cram | Killexams C9550-400 rehearse questions | Killexams C2170-011 exam prep | Killexams HP0-J17 questions and answers | Killexams 000-783 sample test |
Killexams F50-532 questions and answers | Killexams M9560-231 questions and answers | Killexams 650-125 rehearse test | Killexams 1Z0-045 test prep | Killexams VTNE dump | Killexams C2090-461 cram | Killexams 000-218 rehearse test | Killexams LOT-822 dumps questions | Killexams 000-R18 test questions | Killexams 3M0-250 braindumps | Killexams NREMT-PTE real questions | Killexams BCP-520 rehearse test | Killexams 000-M06 mock exam | Killexams 000-052 test prep | Killexams NailTech free pdf | Killexams HP0-634 cheat sheets | Killexams 000-596 VCE | Killexams Praxis-Core examcollection | Killexams MOS-EXP rehearse questions | Killexams 920-158 pdf download |
ARMONK, N.Y., April 13 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today added recent servers, services and software to its lineup of 2010 systems designed to reclaim a lid on the rising costs and complexities of operating modern data centers. The recent offerings attend clients garner the benefits of IBM's three-year, $3 billion investment in POWER7(TM) systems that are ready for recent workloads, such as the growing disburse of powerful, real-time industry analytics.
(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20090416/IBMLOGO )
They comprise blade servers built on IBM's POWER7 workload-optimized systems' design, recent systems software that can reduce the deployment of workloads from weeks to minutes, and recent services to remotely implement the systems, reducing costs by up to 25%.
IBM furthermore announced its POWER7 technology achieved record performance for a ambit of workloads.
New POWER7 Blades, Systems Software, Services: Improved Performance, Reduced Data center Costs
With four, eight or 16 cores per blade, the recent POWER7 servers tender clients the identical 64-bit POWER® technology at toil in some of the world's most censorious data centers in government, research, finance and high-tech industries, among others.
Built on the proven foundation of the IBM BladeCenter® family of products and designed for mid-size businesses needing enhanced performance to manage growth and reduce complexity, the low recent PS700, PS701 and PS702 Express are the premier blades for workloads ranging from web-tier and SAP application servers to distributed databases in blade-based data centers. POWER7's innovative technologies automatically optimize the blades' performance and energy efficiency, allowing the recent BladeCenter PS702 Express to deliver 225% better performance per blade than the Oracle Sun Blade T6340, and 188% greater performance per blade than the HP Integrity BL860c Blade. (1)
For more information Go to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/
New IBM Systems Director Software helps adjust computing resources in virtualized data center environments to focus on priority workloads. With IBM Systems Director 6.2 and IBM Systems Director VMControl, multiple virtualized and physical systems can be managed from a solitary interface, recent workloads can be deployed in minutes instead of weeks, and server administration costs can be reduced up to 34%. IBM lively Energy Manager 4.3 monitors and manages energy disburse and can reduce systems energy costs by nearly 30% on Power servers. (2)
For more information on recent IBM Systems Director, VMControl and lively Energy Manager offerings Go to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/software/index.html
IBM Global Technology Services' new, remotely delivered implementation and migration services provide a lower-cost mode (shaves up to 25% from installation costs) to install and implement IBM systems. Remote delivery allows IBM to staff engagements more quickly and gives clients a faster recur on their investment. Initially available in the U.S. and Canada with plans to expand to the comfort of the world later in the year, these remotely delivered, lower priced services attend clients optimize system performance and reduce time to value.
For more information, Go to: www.ibm.com/services/implementation
IBM furthermore announced today a recent exchange program to allow clients to upgrade to POWER7 technology immediately. IBM's lending and leasing unit, IBM Global Financing, is offering well-qualified clients to scuttle up to POWER7 systems at monthly costs near to, or lower than what they are paying for a current POWER6(TM) lease. The program furthermore provides for side-by-side migration of up to 60 days with microscopic to no downtime as the upgrade occurs.
For more information Go to: http://www-03.ibm.com/financing/us/lifecycle/acquire/powerx.html
Eight-Core POWER7 System Boosts Transaction-Processing Performance to Slash Licensing Costs More Than 80%
Using a sliver of its total, 64-core processing power, IBM's Power® 780 system today became the first server to deliver more than 1.2 million transactions-per-minute on only eight cores according to Transaction Processing Performance Council results. With price/performance of less than 70 cents per transaction per minute, the Power 780's 1.2 million transactions-per-minute sets a recent record in performance-per-core - 4.6 times better than an HP Superdome and 7.5 times better than a Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 cluster running Oracle RAC. (3)
For businesses that race SAP, the Power 780 handled 37,000 users on 64 cores - 16% more users than a 256-core Sun Enterprise M9000 and 130% more users than a 64-core Fujitsu system running Intel Xeon® X7560 chips. (4)
Record-Setting Performance for Web and Analytics Workloads
The Power 780 furthermore demonstrated the ability to deliver leadership, workload-optimized performance by setting recent records across the three major industry-standard processor benchmarks for Java, integer and high-performance-computing workloads, achieving between 1.8 and three-times the performance of low other competitive published eight-socket results. (5)
IBM Power Systems' built-in virtualization provides the ability to scale virtual machines to the plenary capacity of the system - up to eight-times more than VMware. IBM testing indicates clients deploying virtualization may notice up to 65% more performance-per-virtual machine on a Power 750 Express running PowerVM(TM) than a similarly configured HP DL380 G6 running VMware. (6)
Today's benchmark results continue to demonstrate that IBM Power Systems are able to deliver more compute power with fewer cores and less energy consumption than Sun/Oracle and HP/Itanium® based servers. This performance leadership across low major workloads, combined with Power systems' built-in virtualization technology means clients can achieve theatrical cost savings and energy efficiency in their data centers. For instance, by using 87% fewer cores than a Sun SPARC Enterprise Cluster to deliver more than one million transactions per minute, the Power 780 allows clients to slash database licensing and maintenance costs by up to 80%. (7)
New Operating Environments, Developer Tools
New AIX® 6 Express Edition offers clients a new, lower-priced edition of AIX designed for SMB environments or smaller workloads consolidated on midrange or high-end Power Systems. Supporting up to four cores per image and 8GB per core, AIX 6 Express provides the reliability and flexibility of AIX at lower cost. AIX Express joins the existing AIX yardstick and Enterprise Editions to fill out the recent family of AIX 6 offerings.
The recent IBM i 7.1 integrated operating environment is designed to occupy handicap of workload optimization features of POWER7, including automatic exploitation of Solid state Drives for optimum performance. Enhanced champion for XML in DB2®, the integrated database for IBM i, helps companies exchange information between customers and suppliers, a recent virtualization feature for PowerVM enables simpler testing of recent releases before a software upgrade, and asynchronous geographic mirroring with PowerHA(TM) SystemMirror provides champion for multi-site clustering over longer distances.
For more information Go to: www.ibm.com/systems/power/software/i/advantages/v7r1/index.html
IBM Rational Developer for Power V7.6 gives users of Power Systems on AIX a modern, Eclipse-based progress environment that supports C/C++ and COBOL development, and is furthermore tightly integrated with Rational Team Concert for Power Systems for improved application lifecycle management. IBM is furthermore introducing Rational compilers for C/C++ and Fortran, both optimized for POWER7. This recent environment can provide up to 30% improvement in workload productivity. (8)
For more information Go to http://www-01.ibm.com/software/rational/announce/power/
For more information on recent products announced today and to register for a special IBM webcast visit ibm.com/systemsContact(s) information Rick Bause IBM Media Relations 845-892-5463 [email protected] Mike Corrado IBM Media Relations 914-766-4635 [email protected]
IBM is a trademark of IBM Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. low other company/product names and service marks may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries licensed exclusively through The Open Group. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvald.
(1) SPEC® and the benchmark names SPECrate®, SPECint®, and SPECjbb® are registered trademarks of the yardstick Performance Evaluation Corporation. For the latest SPEC benchmark results, visit http://www.spec.org. low results are the best result posted at www.spec.org as of April 5, 2010 for the system indicated except for the IBM BladeCenter result which was submitted to SPEC as of April 13, 2010.
SPECint_rate 2006 results: IBM BladeCenter PS702 with 16 cores, two processor chips, and four threads per core had a peak result of 520. HP Integrity BL860c i2 with 8 cores, 2 processor chips and two threads per core had a peak result of 134. Sun Blade T6340 with 16 cores, two processor chips and eight threads per core had a peak result of 160.
SPECjbb2005 results: : IBM BladeCenter PS702 with 16 cores, two processor chips, and four threads per core running with 16 JVM instances had a result of 1,119,946 bops and 69,997 bops per JVM. Sun Blade T6340 with 16 cores, two processor chips and eight threads per core running with 16 JVM instances had a result of 388,456 bops and 24,279 bops per JVM.
(2) Source: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/common/ssi/sa/wh/n/xbw03007usen/XBW03007USEN.PDF
page 3 of VALUE PROPOSITION FOR IBM SYSTEMS DIRECTOR
Challenges of Operational Management for Enterprise Server Installations
International Technology Group
(3) Transaction performance based on tpmC results as on 4/9/2010. Source: Transaction Processing Performance Council, www.tpc.org as of 4/9/10. IBM result submitted on 4/13/10. IBM Power 780 with 2 processor chips, 8 cores, 16 threads achieved 1,200,011 tpmC @ $.69 $/tpmC. Database was DB2 9.1 on AIX 6.1. System availability is 10/13/2010. tpmC per core is 150,001. HP Integrity Superdome with 64 processor chips, 128 cores, 256 threads achieved 4,092,799 tpmC @ $2.93 $/tpmC. Database was Oracle 10g on HP-UX 11i v3. System availability was 8/6/2007. tpmC per core is 31,975. Sun/Oracle T5440 cluster with 48 processor chips, 384 cores, 3,072 threads achieved 7,646,486 tpmC @ $2.36 $/tpmC. Database was Oracle 11g EE RAC on Solaris 10. System availability was 3/19/2010. tpmC per core is 19,913. IBM x3850 M2 with 4 processor chips, 16 cores, 16 threads achieved 516,752 tpmC @ $2.59 $/tpmC. Database was DB2 9.5 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. System availability was 3/14/2008. tpmC per core is 32,297.
(4) The IBM Power 780 achieved the highest result ever published on the two-tier SAP® Sales and Distribution (SD) yardstick application benchmark running SAP enhancement package 4 for the SAP ERP application Release 6.0 (Unicode) with a result of 37,000 SAP SD benchmark users. The 64-core Power 780 handled 16 percent more users than a 256-core Sun Enterprise M9000 (Oracle's biggest system) and 130 percent more users than a 64-core Fujitsu 1800E system running Intel's Xeon X7560 chip. IBM Power System 780, 8p / 64-c / 256-t, POWER7, 3.8 GHz, 1024 GB memory, 37,000 SD users, dialog resp.: 0.98s, line items/hour: 4,043,670, Dialog steps/hour: 12,131,000, SAPS: 202,180, DB time (dialog/ update):0.013s / 0.031s, CPU utilization: 99%, OS: AIX 6.1, DB2 9.7, cert# 2010013; SUN M9000, 64p / 256-c / 512-t, 1156 GB memory, 32,000 SD users, SPARC64 VII, 2.88 GHz, Solaris 10, Oracle 10g , cert# 2009046; Fujitsu 1800E, 8p / 64-c / 128-t, 512 GB memory, 16,000 SD users, Intel Xeon X7560, 2.26 GHz, Windows Server 2008 R2 DE, SQL Server 2008, cert#: 2010010. low results are 2-tier, SAP EHP 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) and convincing as of 4/1/2010.
All SAP Sales and Distribution 2-tier benchmark results can be found at http://www.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx
(5) Best in class 8-socket results: IBM Power 780 64-core (3.86 GHz, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip,4 threads/core) SPECint_rate2006 result of 2,526; IBM Power 780 64-core (3.86 GHz, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip,4 threads/core) SPECfp2006 result of 2,240; IBM Power 780 64-core (8 chips, 128 threads) 3.86 GHz IBM Power 780 System running AIX V6.1 with a SPECjbb2005 result of 5,210,501 bops (81,414 bops/JVM).
Competitive 8-socket results: SPECint_rate2006: Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST 1800E 64-core (Intel Xeon X7560, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip, 2 threads/core) SPECint_rate2006 result of 1339; SPECfp_rate 2006: SGI Altix ICE 8200EX 32-core (Intel Xeon X5570, 2.93 GHz, 8 chips, 4 cores/chip, 2 threads/core) SPECfp_rate2006 result of 742; SPECjbb2005: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP DL785 G6 achieved 1,984,616 bops (248,077 bops/JVM on a 480core system (8 chips, 48 threads).
SPEC and the benchmark names SPECrate, SPECint, and SPECjbb are registered trademarks of the yardstick Performance Evaluation Corporation. Benchmark results stated reflect results published on www.spec.org (link resides outside ibm.com) as of April 8, 2010.
(6) "A Comparison of PowerVM and VMware Virtualization Performance", April 2010. White Paper available through www.ibm.com.
(7) pretense based on comparing an 8-core Power 780 system vs. a cluster of two Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 both of which are estimated to deliver over 1 million OLTP transactions per minute. For details on the comparison gratify Go to:
(8) According to IBM industry ally Oxford International, a leading provider of enterprise modernization solutions, recent IBM Rational application progress and management software for POWER7 is providing improvements of up to 30 percent in team productivity in low aspects of the progress process.
Data Centers | NewsNew IBM Mainframe Can Manage 100,000 Virtual Machines Simultaneously
Big Blue's zEnterprise, a "data center in a box," pools RISC and x86-based blades.
IBM has launched what it described its most significant advance in data center infrastructure over the eventual two decades. The recent zEnterprise is a mainframe noteworthy not just because of its increased processing capacity but because it is the first to provide integration with its Power7 blade infrastructure and x86-based blade racks.
Big Blue launched the recent zEnterprise Thursday in recent York. IBM said the recent mainframe is 60 percent faster and equally more efficient from a power utilization perspective than the model it replaces, the z10.
The mainframe has a 5.2 GHz processor with up to 96 cores, houses 3 TB of RAM, and can process 50 billion instructions per second (BIPS). In addition to the boost in capacity, it allows the x86 and Power7 processor-based systems to race as a common virtualized platform, sharing network, storage, and power components.
"This is the most powerful announcement they acquire ever made in the history of the IBM company in terms of customer economics," said Steve Mills, senior vice president of IBM's software and hardware divisions. "We acquire never in their history done anything that has reclaim more money back in the hands of the customer than this announcement. They acquire solved a massive industry problem that almost any industry of reasonable size has today, and that's bringing down that cost of IT operation."
Mills, who called this recent system a "data center in a box," extolled its recent integrated platform for its shared infrastructure across various processors. The system can manage 100,000 virtual machines simultaneously, a threshold Mills said will be difficult to duplicate. "During this decade, nobody will deliver deeper, more profound, fully mobile, fully portable virtualization the artery this system provides plenary virtualization for workloads," Mills said.
At the core of this recent virtualized capability is the combination of IBM's recent zEnterprise Blade center Extension (xBX) and the zEnterprise Unified Resource Manager, which allow for the sharing of workloads between the core mainframe and IBM's Power7 and x86 processor blades.
The Universal Resource Manager is made up of software and embedded hardware, said IBM Distinguished Engineer Donna Dillenberger, in an interview at launch event. "It's on both sides. It's on the mainframe side and the blade side, so you can procure a coherent view of what's running, and you can procure a coherent management actions between both, and it comes with zEnterprise," Dillenberger said.
In the past IBM had individual technologies that managed various clusters, but the Universal Resource Manager provides a much tighter association, added David Gelardi, IBM's vice president of sales, support, and education. "It's a very broad pipe between the blade environment and the mainframe environment," Gelardi said in an interview. "That is very significant from an application perspective, that's where the integration comes from."
While IBM talked up its ability to race Linux-based x86 blades, it talked down its ability to race Windows workloads. It's "about want of visibility into source code, not wanting to champion an OS that 'drag[s] in primitives from DOS,' and generally not being able to shape Windows to the management IBM would want," notable Redmonk analyst Michael Cote in a blog posting.
But Gelardi said organizations silent could opt to race Windows workloads. "There's no understanding you can't disburse it to race Windows because Tivoli's provisioning capabilities is operating systems agnostic," he said. "Windows would race on an outboard blade and ultimately would race on an xBlade inside zBX."
Jeffrey Schwartz is editor of Redmond magazine and furthermore covers cloud computing for Virtualization Review's Cloud Report. In addition, he writes the Channeling the Cloud column for Redmond Channel Partner. succeed him on Twitter @JeffreySchwartz.
Why is it that every time humans develop a really ingenious computer system in the movies, it seems intent on killing every eventual one of us at its first opportunity?
In Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece, 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL 9000 starts off as an attentive, if slightly creepy, custodian of the astronauts aboard the USS Discovery One, before famously turning homicidal and trying to destroy them all. In The Matrix, humanity’s invention of AI promptly results in human-machine warfare, leading to humans enslaved as a biological source of energy by the machines. In Daniel H. Wilson’s bespeak Robopocalypse, computer scientists finally crack the code on the AI problem, only to acquire their creation develop a sudden and deep dislike for its creators.
And you’re not an especially sentient being yourself if you haven’t heard the yarn of Skynet (see The Terminator, T2, T3, etc.)
The simple reply is that — movies enjoy Wall-E, Short Circuit, and Chappie, notwithstanding — Hollywood knows that nothing guarantees box office gold quite enjoy an existential threat to low of humanity. Whether that threat is likely in real life or not is decidedly beside the point. How else can one interpret the endless march of zombie flicks, not to mention those pesky, shark-infested tornadoes?
The reality of AI is nothing enjoy the movies. Siri, Alexa, Watson, Cortana — these are their HAL 9000s, and zero seems even vaguely murderous. The technology has taken leaps and bounds in the eventual decade, and seems poised to finally match the vision their artists acquire depicted in film for decades. What then?
Is Siri just a few upgrades away from killing you in your sleep, or is Hollywood running away with a tired idea? Looking back at the eventual decade of AI research helps to paint a clearer picture of a sometimes frightening, sometimes enlightened future.
An increasing number of prominent voices are being raised about the real dangers of humanity’s continuing toil on so-called ersatz intelligence.
Chief among them is Dr. Nick Bostrom, a philosopher who furthermore holds degrees in physics and computational neuroscience. In his 2014 book, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, he outlines in rigorous detail the various ways a “strong” AI — should they succeed in structure one — would wipe us off the puss of the planet the flash it escapes their control. Forget about wholesale nuclear annihilation — that’s how power-hungry human dictators Go about dealing with an unwanted group of humans. No, a tough AI would instead starve us to death, disburse up low of their natural resources, or, if it’s emotion really desperate, dismantle their bodies at a molecular even and disburse the resulting biomass for its own purposes.
Dr. Nick Bostrom warns about the potential dangers of a runaway AI at a 2015 TED talk in Vancouver, Canada. (Photo: Bret Hartman/TED)
But don’t occupy it personally. As Bostrom points out, an ersatz superintelligence likely won’t behave according to any human notions of morality or ethics. “Anthropomorphic frames animate unfounded expectations about the growth trajectory of a seed AI and about the psychology, motivations, and capabilities of a develope superintelligence,” he says.
Don’t let Bostrom’s professorial language fool you — he’s deadly staid about the consequences of an AI that can outthink even the smartest human being, and zero of them are good. More frighteningly, he says that they may Go from giving ourselves high-fives over creating the first AI that can consider as well as they can to cowering in the corner as it hunts us down in as microscopic as a few weeks, or perhaps even days. It low comes down to a few key factors that will likely influence their future with AI.
Computers consider really fast. In the best-case scenario, we’ll acquire enough time between an AI acquiring the ability to consider as well as us and its ascend to super-intelligent status that they can adjust and respond. On the other hand, as Bostrom points out, when you’re dealing with a machine that can consider — and therefore develop — at an almost unimaginable speed, by the time they realize what’s going on, it will already be far too late to halt it. Some readers may recall the 1970s sci-fi horror flick Demon Seed, in which an AI not only predicts that it will be shut down by its fearful creator, but employs murder and rape to ensure its survival.
“If and when a takeoff occurs,” Bostrom writes, “it will likely be explosive.” Stephen Hawking has echoed this sentiment: “Once humans design ersatz intelligence,” he says, “it will occupy off on its own and develop at an ever-increasing rate. Humans, who are limited by slack biological evolution, couldn’t compete and would be superseded.”
Computers often defer unexpected results. AI researchers are regularly surprised by the outcome of their experiments. In 2013, a researcher discovered that his AI — designed to learn to play NES games — decided to respite the gameplay on Tetris as its preferred solution to the goal of not losing.
At their early stage of AI development, this is a worthy thing; surprises often lead to recent discoveries. Unexpected results paired with a massive and sudden surge in intelligence would be quite the opposite. Being able to anticipate the artery a superintelligent AI will respond to, well, anything, could prove to be impossible, in much the identical artery their actions and motivations are utterly impenetrable to an insect.Strong AI, frail AI, and the stuff they already use
Artificial intelligence research has at times resembled the hunt for the Holy Grail. In the summer of 1956, there was a credence that they could achieve tough AI (aka, ersatz generic intelligence), which can be thought of as mimicking human intelligence in low of its forms, functions, and subtleties. Researchers at Dartmouth University thought that if they could endow computers with the basic structure blocks of human intelligence — reasoning, information representation, planning, natural language processing, and perception — then somehow, generic intelligence would simply emerge.
Obviously, that didn’t happen. In fact, over the intervening decades, there were several boom and bust cycles in AI research (often dubbed “AI winters”) that moved a few of these structure blocks forward, but then failed to point to ongoing progress after an initial era of excitement.
What did chance were various advances in each of the structure blocks, resulting in an assortment of “weak AIs,” or practical AIs.
AI doesn’t just exist in far-flung visions of the future. Google has been using it since 2015 to improve search results. (Video: Google)
The Google search engine could just be the best-known illustration of frail AI. Its algorithms enact an exceptional job of pulling together hundreds of variables and combining those with the words you type to defer a results page culled from the vastness of the web.
In fact, most of the examples of AI from the past 10 years probably haven’t struck you as examples of AI at all, which just goes to point to how successful they’ve been. Most acquire quietly and seamlessly integrated themselves into their lives, making them better in petite but significant ways.
Google’s Photos product shows how far we’ve near in perception AI — type in “bicycle” and it will find photos you’ve taken of two-wheeled vehicles, even if you never labeled them as such.
The predictive text options that loom as they type on their phones reclaim us valuable taps, while autocorrect attempts to fabricate up for the fact that on-screen keyboards and human thumbs are a recipe for inaccuracy (notwithstanding the hilarity that often ensues when it tries to near to their rescue).
Amazon’s “suggested for you” product recommendations feature is an illustration of AI used to fabricate money. It was reportedly accountable for 35 percent of the company’s sales in 2006, and the people behind the technology acquire since made it available to other retailers, resulting in “billions” of sales.
So-called intelligent assistants from Apple, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft (Siri, Google Now, Alexa, and Cortana, respectively) low leverage recent advances in natural language processing (NLP), combined with sophisticated heuristics, which fabricate questions enjoy “what’s the weather going to be enjoy today?” the hands-free equivalent of jumping into a weather app or Googling the identical phrase. Google’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, recently boasted that his company’s NLP AI is approaching human levels of understanding, which may interpret why he told shareholders that “the next vast step will be for the very concept of the ‘device’ to fade away.”
The Waze GPS and crowdsourced mapping app is a noteworthy illustration of AI planning.
Recently, chatbots acquire become the most “talked about” form of AI. In 2014, the University of Reading in England declared that the Turing Test had finally been passed, 65 years after its inception, by an algorithm masquerading as a 13-year-old Ukrainian boy named Eugene. Eugene is a chatbot — a pretty worthy one by low accounts — but despite passing the test, it is silent not an illustration of just tough AI. Cleverbot — another AI chatbot – which is claimed to acquire passed the Turing Test in 2011, is available to acquire a chat with anyone. But labeling it “intelligent,” might depend on your definition of the word.
Me: enact you believe in God?Clev: enact you?Me: That’s not an answer.Clev: You did not quiz a question.Me: Yes I did. I asked: enact you believe in God?Clev: Yes, I do. Why don’t you?Me: Why enact you consider I don’t believe in God?Clev: Because you said that you did not.Me: No, I didn’t. You aren’t a very worthy listener, are you?Clev: Fine fine. I know you said that. But whatever. enact you enjoy Lady Gaga?
Both the Turing Test itself and the claims that it has been passed, are not without criticism.
Microsoft scholarly just how fallible a chatbot AI can be in a spectacularly public fashion when it released Tay, an AI Twitter bot, on an unsuspecting global audience earlier this year. Less than 24 hours after Tay began interacting with people, she — er — it, became sexist and racist, offering praise for Hitler among other gaffes.
From left to right, Jeopardy host Alex Trebek poses with legendary contestants Ken Jennings, IBM’s Watson supercomputer, and Brad Rutter. Watson would later wipe the floor with both human contestants in a showdown. (Photo: Jeopardy Productions)Where’s Watson?
If the AI industry has a celebrity, it’s IBM’s Watson. After handily defeating all-time Jeopardy! champ Ken Jennings in 2011, the supercomputing application dropped the mic and started a recent life in the slightly less exciting sphere of commercial applications. But Watson’s conquest caused a lot of people to start wondering if IBM’s wunderkind was in fact an embryonic HAL 9000. Guru Banavar, IBM’s Vice President of Cognitive Computing, places it in a different category entirely.
“We consider of AI as augmented intelligence, as opposed to ersatz intelligence,” Banavar told Digital Trends. He believes that the notion of AI as a carbon copy of the human brain is a distraction, one that entirely misses the point of how this technology can best be reclaim to use. “Augmented intelligence is a partnering between a person and a machine,” he explains, with the goal being to offload the toil that a person isn’t able to enact as well as the machine. It forms a symbiotic relationship of sorts, in which the two entities toil better together than each of them would enact on their own.
IBM refers to this approach to AI as “cognitive computing,” specifically because it does not hunt to replicate the entirety of human intelligence. The approach IBM took to solving the Jeopardy! problem wasn’t centered on making a synthetic brain, but rather on getting a machine to process a very specific type of information — language — in order to hunt for and ultimately defer the birthright reply for the game’s reverse-question format. To enact this, Banavar recounts, took a combination of advances “going back almost 10 years.” Simply getting Watson to understand the massive number of permutations of signification within English, was daunting. Its eventual success was “a vast breakthrough for the all realm of computer science,” Banavar claims.
IBM continues to develop Watson, as well as its other investments in AI, in pursuit of what Banavar calls “grand challenges.” These are computing problems so difficult and complex, they often require dozens of researchers and a sustained investment over months or years. Or, as Banavar puts it: “Not something you can enact with a brace of guys in a garage.”
A cluster of 90 IBM Power 750 servers power Watson, and each one uses a 3.5 GHz POWER7 eight-core processor. (Video: IBM)
One such challenge is reading medical images. The growing number of X-rays, CT scans, PET scans, and MRIs being done every day is a potential lifesaving boon for patients, but it’s furthermore a growing problem for the profession of radiology. At the moment, a radiologist must personally assess each scan to determine for signs of disease or other anomalies. The sheer number of scans being done are creating increasing exact for trained radiologists, whose numbers are limited simply due to the rigorous and lengthy training required to become one. Banavar describes the toil they enact as “very monotonous and error prone,” not because these doctors want the skill, but because they are only human. It’s a scenario that seems almost custom-built for the benevolent of AI that IBM has been working on. In order to significantly impact the number and quality of scans that can be processed, researchers are using Watson to understand the content of the images, within the plenary medical context of the patient. “Within the next two years,” Banavar says, “we will notice some very significant breakthroughs in this.”Teaching a machine to learn
For IBM to succeed, it will acquire to decipher a problem that has plagued AI efforts from their very beginnings: Computers mind to succeed the instructions they’re given in such a literal artery that, when the unexpected occurs — a situation the developer hadn’t foreseen — they proceed anyway, often with undesirable outcomes. But what if machines possessed the ability to know when something doesn’t quite felicitous and adjust accordingly, without being told so explicitly? In other words, what if they possessed common sense?
Dr. Maya Gupta is a senior AI researcher at Google, and she is attempting to enact just that. Using a utensil within the AI arsenal known as machine learning, Gupta and her colleagues are slowly training computers to filter information in a artery that most humans find relatively simple. Her current goal — improving video recommendations on YouTube — might appear modest, or even boring, but from an AI researcher’s perspective, it’s nirvana. That’s because of the fundamental contrast between how machines and humans learn.
“A 3-year-old can learn an gargantuan amount of things from very few examples,” Gupta says. The identical cannot be said for computers, which require vast quantities of data to acquire the identical even of understanding. It furthermore requires some pretty significant computing resources, which is why Nvidia recently launched a recent benevolent of supercomputer developed specifically to race deep-learning algorithms.
Curiously, computer scientists acquire known how to “teach” machines for several decades. The missing ingredient has been, well, the ingredients. “You can acquire a model that can learn from a billion examples,” Gupta explains, “but if you don’t acquire a billion examples, the machine has nothing to learn from.” Which is why YouTube, with its monster catalog of videos, is the consummate location to nurture a data-hungry process enjoy machine learning. Gupta’s algorithms are being taught two kinds of common sense, known as smoothness and monotonicity. Both feel enjoy child’s play: Smoothness dictates that you shouldn’t let one petite change fling off a determination that has been based on dozens of other factors, while monotonicity operates on an “all other things being equal, this one fact should fabricate it the best choice” principle.
In practice, smoothness means that a potentially noteworthy video recommendation isn’t dismissed by the algorithm simply because it contained both cooking and traveling information, when the previously watched video was purely about cooking. For monotonicity, Gupta cites the illustration of recommending a coffee shop. If you’ve identified that you enjoy coffee shops that serve organic, impartial trade coffee and that furthermore acquire free Wi-Fi, then the one that is closest to you should top the recommended list, even though you never specified distance as important. “It would astound some humans just how difficult that is,” Gupta says of the application involved in teaching machines to respect patterns that any 5-year-old could pick up on.
Project Malmo Katja HoffmanMore
Microsoft researcher Katja Hofmann, center, is teaching machines to play Minecraft as fragment of Project Malmo, which is intended to improve human-machine cooperation. (Photo: Scott Eklund/Red Box Pictures)Mining for information in Minecraft
As successful as it might be at finding just the birthright video for you, that algorithm has anxiety performing the identical job with music recommendation. “It’s difficult to transfer what we’ve learned,” Gupta acknowledges, something she says is a challenge for the industry, not just Google. So how enact you educate an AI to be flexible, in addition to having common sense? Dr. Katja Hofmann, a researcher at the Machine Intelligence and Perception group at Microsoft Research Cambridge, thinks she has the answer: educate it how to play Minecraft.
Project Malmo is Hofmann’s attempt to repurpose the massively current online game into an experimentation platform for ersatz intelligence research. Her team has developed a modification for the game that lets AI “agents” interact directly with the Minecraft environment. “Minecraft is really spicy because it’s an open-world game,” Hofmann told us, which offers a unique space in which AI agents can deal with different environments that change over time, a key point if you’re trying to foster flexible learning. This aspect of Minecraft created problems during early attempts to procure agents to achieve goals. “The world doesn’t wait for the agent to fabricate its decision,” she says, referring to the real-time nature of the game, and its obvious parallels to real life.
Using the mod not only gives an agent the ability to manipulate the LEGO-like bricks of material that are central to the game’s environment — it can furthermore interact with other players, including humans. One of Hofmann’s long-term goals for Project Malmo is to improve human-computer cooperation. Much enjoy at IBM, the philosophy driving these experiments, and in fact Microsoft’s entire approach to AI, is that it should toil collaboratively with people. Experiments acquire already revealed that AI agents are able to complete tasks which humans simply found too hard. Hofmann is eagerly anticipating an agent that learns to collaborate with humans to decipher tasks. “That would express they acquire achieved a vast breakthrough,” she said.
It could near from collaboration. Earlier this year, Microsoft decided to open source Project Malmo, a scuttle that could defer significant discoveries, especially if Microsoft’s competitors occupy an interest. IBM’s Watson has proven its trivia chops on Jeopardy! but how would it fare when asked to build a house out of bricks? Over at Google, the team behind DeepMind has already enjoyed success in getting an algorithm to learn how to play Space Invaders! — a game with a solitary goal — maximize points — and only three control options: scuttle left, scuttle right, and fire. Does it possess the flexibility that Hofmann is trying to animate for success in Minecraft?Strike up the roboband
Having an entity that can apply logic, reasoning, and brute mathematical prowess to challenges in engineering, medicine, and research just makes sense. But what about art? Can AI play a role in the creation of beauty, whether it’s cinema, sculpture, or even music? Google is determined to find out.
The company recently showed off the capabilities of its DeepMind AI platform to accomplish mind-bending, almost hallucinogenic transformations of images and videos through a process it has dubbed DeepDream. It’s a fun, trippy thing to enact to your favorite photos, but it seems to topple short of the independent creative process they normally ascribe to “artists,” and might be more appropriately described as an Instagram filter on steroids.
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream c e deMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream d caMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream c e fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fc aeMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream eMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream bf c caMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream ec bMore
Google’s deep Dream Generator reinterprets photos into psychedelic works of know-how using neural networks. (Photos: deep Dream Generator)
Dr. Douglas Eck, a research scientist at Google, was intrigued when he first saw DeepDream. He recognized it immediately as a powerful illustration of machine learning, or “good ol’-fashioned neural networks, done right,” as he puts it. But Eck was furthermore struck by something else: “This stuff can be fun.” So Eck decided to lobby the senior brass at Google to let him build a petite team to investigate how machine learning could be further leveraged in the world of art, only this time it would be focused on music, an locality Eck has long been passionate about. “Much to my pleasure,” Eck recounts, “Google was birthright on board with this,” and Magenta was born.
Generating music algorithmically isn’t new. You can listen to some of Eck’s own efforts from his time working on it at the University of Montreal in 2002. “The question is,” Eck asks, philosophically, “how enact you build models that can generate [music] and can understand whether they’re worthy or not, based upon feedback from their audience, and then improve?” It starts to sound enjoy Magenta is going to unleash a horrible recent wave of computer-generated Muzak, but Eck is quick to assure us that’s not the point. “In the end,” he says, “people want to connect with people. Consuming 100-percent machine-generated content is a bit of departed end.”
Instead, he sees Magenta as an opening to create the world’s next electric guitar. “Can they build AI tools that attend people express themselves in ways they couldn’t before?” Eck wonders. He cites Jimi Hendrix’s iconic disburse of amplification and distortion as an example: “That really opened up all channels for him to express himself that weren’t there before,” he told Digital Trends.
But unlike Hendrix’s guitar, the instruments that Magenta births will ideally be smart. Really smart. “You can already drop some bass loops into GarageBand and play on top of it,” he points out. “But what if there’s actually some smarts to this bassist?” In Eck’s vision of the future, the Magenta code base will construct a virtual bandmate that listens to you as you play, and can intelligently — perhaps even creatively — succeed along and respond accordingly. “It’s enjoy your copilot,” he said.
Just enjoy Project Malmo, Magenta is now open source, an significant step if any of Eck’s dreams for a backup company of AI musicians are to be realized. Because Magenta is built on a machine-learning framework — Google’s own open-source TensorFlow software — it is incredibly data hungry. By opening access to a worldwide community of musicians, Magenta could evolve very quickly. “If they can be playing along with other musicians, the amount of information that’s present for learning is just astonishing,” Eck enthuses.From music to megalomania?
Each of the AI experts they spoke to low participate an enthusiasm for the future potential of the technology that borders on the religious. They furthermore participate an equally skeptical view of Bostrom’s doomsday prophecies. For them, the notion that one day a superintelligent AI will revolve on an unsuspecting human population remains very much the domain of science fiction, not science fact.
“I enact not believe that machines are going to halt up being autonomous entities that Go off and enact things on their own,” IBM’s Banavar says when asked about the likelihood of a machine intelligence that would need to be controlled. His primary concern for their future with the machines is one that programmers acquire been obsessing over for years: poverty-stricken performance because of bug-ridden code. “That’s a much bigger problem in my intelligence than machines that will wake up one day and enact something they weren’t designed to do,” he said.
Google’s Gupta points to a basic stumbling block that she thinks will hamstring the progress of a tough AI for years to come: “Our best philosophers and neuroscientists aren’t positive what consciousness is,” she notes, “so how can they even start talking about what it means [for a machine to be conscious] or how they would Go about replicating that digitally?” It’s difficult to bid if she’s being wholehearted or coy — many observers acquire suggested that if any entity working on the AI problem today will crack the code, it’s probably going to be Google. Given a sufficiently long runway, she believes anything is possible. “I consider they can enact it … I’d consider in the next hundred years,” she offers. “I’m just not positive it’s going to be that interesting.”
Microsoft’s Hofmann echoes Gupta’s thoughts about the hardship of achieving a machine with a truly generic even of intelligence. “I believe that it may be workable in principle,” she says, “but just knowing the state of the know-how in AI, I don’t notice us getting anywhere near to those predictions any time in the near future.”
Google’s Eck finds the topic slightly exasperating. “This all credence of superintelligence,” he says, “it just doesn’t fabricate sense to me. I guess I really don’t procure it.” It’s difficult to reconcile this confusion with the fact that he’s on a mission to create the first intelligent, synthetic musician. But he clarifies a flash later: “My view of cognition is so tied to human perception and action. I don’t determine at their brains as these computational boxes [in competition] with these other, stronger brains in boxes that chance to be inside computers.” When asked how far they might be from such a scenario, he laughs and says, “Twenty years!” because, as he points out, that’s the habitual time frame experts give when they acquire no idea, but they need to snort something.
Skeptics of Bostrom’s predictions of AI supremacy aren’t limited to those working in the field. He has furthermore drawn criticism from the world of philosophy and ethics. Michael Chorost, author of Rebuilt: How Becoming fragment Computer Made Me More Human and World Wide Mind: The Coming Integration of Humanity, Machines, and the Internet, feels he has a tough understanding of how computers and their code work, despite not having a background in AI. He classifies Bostrom’s Superintelligence as “a brilliantly wrong book.”
Chorost believes they may create increasingly powerful AI agents, but he’s unconvinced these algorithms will ever become sentient, let solitary sapient. He compares these concerns to climbing a tree, and then declaring we’re closer to the moon. Much enjoy Gupta, Banavar and Eck, he says the biggest question is how a machine, made up of circuits and code, could ever achieve that status. He subscribes to the credence that there is something inherently special about their bodies, and their “aqueous chemical” makeup, that no electronic system will ever be able to duplicate.
He falls short of ruling it out completely, however, and offers one possibly viable route it could take: An evolutionary one. Instead of trying to program awareness into machines, they should let nature enact the weighty lifting. “Putting it in a complex environment that forces [an AI] to evolve,” Chorost suggests, might enact the trick. “The environment should be lethally complex,” he says, evoking images of AIs competing in a virtual gladiator’s arena, “so that it kills off ineffective systems and rewards effective ones.”
The other benefit to this ersatz Darwinism, if it succeeds, is that it will defer a righteous AI with no genocidal tendencies. “Morality is actually built into how evolution works,” he claims, aphorism that low you need to enact is determine at humanity for the proof. “Despite both world wars, the rate of violent death has been consistently falling,” he notes. “We’re actually getting more righteous with each passing decade — that is not accidental. That’s a process that comes out of reason.” Chorost himself reasons that any AI that develops over time — thanks to evolution — will thus be a kinder, gentler entity because we’ve seen this process play out in low of us.So why worry?
Perhaps Chorost is right. Perhaps the essential ingredients for sentience will never be reproduced in silicon, and we’ll be able to live comfortably knowing that as incredibly capable as Siri becomes, she’s never going to succeed her own desires instead of catering to ours, enjoy in the movie Her. But even if you don’t buy into the credence that one day AI will become an existential threat, Gary Marchant thinks they should low be paying a lot more attention to the risks that near with even a moderately more sophisticated even of ersatz intelligence.
Officially, Marchant is the Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona state University. When he’s not lecturing students at ASU, he’s working on a legal and ethical framework for the progress of AI as a member of the international engineering standards body, the IEEE. When he’s not doing that, Marchant co-investigates the “control and accountable innovation in the progress of autonomous machines” thanks to vouchsafe money from the Future Of Life Institute — an organization that funds research and outreach on scenarios that could pose an existential risk to humanity (including AI). These activities give Marchant a 50,000-foot perspective on AI that few others possess. His conclusion? There are two areas that require immediate attention.
Military drones enjoy the MQ-9 Reaper currently only operate with human pilots remotely at the controls, but AI developments may eventually enable them to destroy autonomously. (Photo: generic Atomics Aeronautical)
“One that concerns me the most,” he says, “is the disburse of AI in the military.” At the moment, the U.S. drone arsenal is remote-controlled. The pilot is silent in command, even if she’s sitting hundreds of miles away, but that scenario may already acquire an expiration date. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, is reportedly interested in developing autonomous software agents that could identify and repair security risks in computing systems. “There will be tough incentives to Go more and more autonomous,” Marchant warns, because it will be seen as the only viable artery to respond to an adversary who is already benefitting from the faster-than-human decision-making these systems are capable of. “Then you’re reliant on these systems not to fabricate mistakes,” he notes, ominously.
It might be light to boot his concerns were it not for the fact that a federal advisory board to the Department of Defense just released a study on autonomy that echoes his words, almost verbatim: “Autonomous capabilities are increasingly ubiquitous and are readily available to allies and adversaries alike. The study therefore concluded that DoD must occupy immediate action to accelerate its exploitation of autonomy while furthermore preparing to counter autonomy employed by adversaries.”
The other disburse of AI that Marchant believes is in need of examination is much closer to home: “The movement toward autonomous cars,” he says, is going to require thoughtful progress and much better regulation.
Tesla Autopilot allows the Model S to drive autonomously on the highway, but a number of crashes prove it’s not yet perfect. (Video: Tesla)
“As they recently saw with Tesla,” he observes, referencing the recent crashes — and one death — connected to the company’s autopilot system, “it’s a harbinger of what’s to near — people being injured or killed by an autonomous system making decisions.”
He highlights the very real ethical decisions that will be faced by AI-controlled cars: In an accident situation, whose life should be preserved — that of the passenger, another driver, or a pedestrian? It’s a question many are wrestling with, including Oren Etzioni, a computer scientist at the University of Washington and the CEO of the Allen Institute for ersatz Intelligence, who told Wired: “We don’t want technology to play God.”
What Marchant clearly isn’t worried about is biting the hand that feeds: Much of his Future Of Life vouchsafe comes from Tesla CEO Elon Musk.What about the jobs?
Today’s manufacturing robots succeed meticulously programmed instructions, but future models enjoy this prototype from Fanuc could learn from reinforcement, just enjoy humans. (Photo: Fanuc)
Further into the future, Marchant sees a huge problem with AI replacing human workers, a process that he claims has already begun. “I was talking to a pathologist,” he recounts, “who said his realm is drying up because machines are taking it over.” Recently, a prototype AI based on IBM’s Watson began working at a global law firm. Its machine discovery and document review capabilities, once sufficiently advanced, could influence the jobs of juvenile associate lawyers, which Marchant thinks demonstrates that it’s not only menial jobs that are at risk. “This is going to become a bigger and bigger issue,” he said. Fanuc, the largest provider of industrial robots, has recently used reinforcement learning to educate an embodied AI how to accomplish a recent job — in 24 hours.
Google’s Gupta offers an optimistic perspective, saying, “The more spicy yarn is the jobs that are being created,” though she stops short of listing any of these recent jobs. Her Google colleague, Eck, puts it into a historical (and of course, musical) frame, noting that the advent of drum machines didn’t create legions of unemployed drummers (or, at the very least, it didn’t add to their existing numbers). “We silent acquire lots of drummers, and a lot of them are doing really awesome things with drum machines,” he says.
Marchant understands these arguments, but ultimately, he rejects them. The always-on, 24/7 decision-making nature of AI puts it into a technology class by itself he says. “There will be so many things that machines will be able to enact better than humans,” he notes. “There was always something for humans to scuttle to in the past. That isn’t the case now.”
Interestingly, the biggest players in AI aren’t deaf to these and other concerns regarding AI’s future impact on society and acquire recently joined forces to create a recent nonprofit organization called The Partnership on ersatz Intelligence to benefit People and Society, or the shorter Partnership on AI. Its members comprise Microsoft, Google, IBM, Facebook, and Amazon, and its stated goal is to “address opportunities and challenges with AI technologies” through open and collaborative research. The partnership isn’t interested in consulting with policymaking bodies, but the public could halt up steering it that artery if they can’t be convinced of the technology’s benefits.
Surprisingly, Marchant isn’t ready to exact more laws or more regulations birthright away. “I’m almost worried that sometimes they scuttle too quickly,” he says, “and start putting in location laws before they know what we’re trying to address.”Just snort no to AI
Dr. Kathleen Richardson, Senior Research Fellow in the Ethics of Robotics at De Montfort University, knows exactly what she’s trying to address: The goal of an awake AI, or any AI designed to mimic animate things, she believes, is a fundamentally flawed pursuit. “The only understanding they consider it’s workable that machines could be enjoy people,” she says, “is because they had — and silent acquire — slavery.” For Richardson, using machines as a stand-in for a person, or indeed any other animate entity, is a byproduct of a debase civilization that is silent trying to find rationalizations to deal people as objects.
“We participate properties with low life,” she says, “but they don’t participate properties with human-made artifacts.” Reversing this logic, Richardson dismissed the notion that they will ever create an aware, sentient, or sapient algorithm. “I completely, utterly, 100 percent reject it,” she says. Perhaps because of this ironclad belief, Richardson doesn’t disburse much time worrying about superintelligent, killer AIs. Why consider about a future that will never near to pass? Instead, she’s focused her research on AI and robotics in the here and now, as well as their near-term impact. What she sees, she does not enjoy — in particular the trend toward robotic companions, driven by improvements in AI. Though most well-known for her anti-sex robot position, Richardson opposes robotic companionship of any kind.
Softbank Pepper RobotMore
Pepper is designed to be a humanoid companion, keeping owners company enjoy a pet, rather than performing any specific task. (Photo: Softbank)
“They snort that these robots — these objects — are going to be therapeutic,” she says, referring specifically to the bleeding-edge Japanese market, which has the champion of industry heavyweights enjoy SoftBank and Sony. Richardson doesn’t reclaim much faith in this notion, which she thinks is nothing more than yet another rationalization linked to slavery. “If you talk to aged people,” she says, “what they want is day trips out, and contact with other human beings. zero of them said, ‘What I want most of low is a robot.’” Perhaps she’s right, and yet that didn’t halt SoftBank’s Pepper — the first companion robot capable of interpreting basic human emotions — from selling out its initial race of 1,000 units in less than a minute.
Sherry Turkle, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher, psychologist and author, agrees with Richardson’s viewpoint, but mostly because she has seen that — contrary to Richardson’s pretense — there is exact for AI companions, and that worries her. In 2013, Turkle gave an interview to Live Science, saying, “The credence of some benevolent of ersatz companionship has already become the recent normal.” The cost for this recent normalcy is that “we acquire to change ourselves, and in the process, they are remaking human values and human connection.”
Sophia from Hanson Robotics, furthermore pictured at the top of this article, achieves an almost creepy even of resemblance to a real human. (Video: Hanson Robotics)
That would be just fine with Dr. David Hanson of Hanson Robotics. “The ersatz intelligence will evolve to the point where they will truly be their friends,” he told CNBC.
Marchant has already weighed in on this subject. Instead of fighting this recent normal, he says they might just acquire to embrace it. In his controversial Slate article, he outlines a future where marriages between humans and robots will not only be legal, they will be inevitable. “If a robotic companion could provide some benevolent of comfort and cherish — patent cherish at least — I’m not positive that’s wrong,” he says, citing the fact that there are many in their society who, for various reasons, are incapable of forming these kinds of relationships with other humans.
Marchant makes it transparent that he silent values human relationships above those that involve synthetic companions, but he’s furthermore prepared to accept that not everyone will participate these values. “I’m certainly not going to marry a robot, but if my son wanted to 20 years from now, I wouldn’t snort he couldn’t enact that,” he claims. “I’d try to talk him out of it, but if that’s what made him happy, I’d be more concerned about that than anything else.” Perhaps as a mark of the times, earlier this year a draft design for the EU included wording that would give robots official standing as “electronic persons.”Stepping toward the future
Facebook CEO label Zuckerberg has said that in 10 years, it’s likely that AI will be better than humans at basic sensory perception. Li Deng, a principal researcher at Microsoft, agrees, and goes even further, saying, “Artificial Intelligence technologies will be used pervasively by ordinary people in their daily lives.”
Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google parent Alphabet, and Google CEO Pichai notice an gargantuan explosion in the number of applications, products, and companies that acquire machine learning at their core. They are quick to point out that this type of AI, with its insatiable appetite for data, will only fulfill its potential when paired with the cloud. Urs Hölzle, Google’s senior vice president of technical infrastructure, said, “Over the next five years, I hope to notice more change in computing than in the eventual five decades.”
These predictions are — slightly obviously, given their sources — highly positive, but that doesn’t express the road ahead will resemble the Autobahn. There could be significant bumps. IBM’s Banavar points to a few challenges that could fetter progress. “One of the breakthroughs they need,” he says, “is how you combine the statistical technique [of machine learning] with the knowledge-based technique.” He refers to the fact that even though machines acquire proven powerful at sifting through huge volumes of data to determine patterns and call outcomes, they silent don’t understand its “meaning.”
The other vast challenge is being able to ramp up the computing power they need to fabricate the next set of AI leaps possible. “We are working on recent architectures,” he reveals, “inspired by the natural structures of the brain.” The premise here is that if brain-inspired software, enjoy neural nets, can defer powerful results in machine learning, then brain-inspired hardware might be equally (or more) powerful.
All this talk about brain-inspired technology inevitably leads us back to their first, spooky, concern: In the future, AI might be a collection of increasingly useful tools that can free us from drudgery, or it could evolve rapidly — and unbeknownst to us — into the most efficient killing machine ever invented.
One of those options certainly seems a lot more desirable, but how enact they fabricate positive that’s the version they halt up with?
If they succeed AI expert Chorost’s advice, there’s no understanding to worry, because as long as their AIs evolve, they’ll develop morality — and morality leads to benevolence. That’s assuming it’s even possible, which he disputes. “When an engineering path [to sentient AI] becomes clear,” he says, “then we’ll acquire a sense of what not to do.”
Banavar, despite being fairly positive that an AI with its own goals isn’t in their future, suggests that “it is a smart thing for us to acquire a artery to revolve off the machine.” The team at Google’s DeepMind disagree and acquire written a paper in conjunction with the Future Of Life Institute that describes how to create the equivalent of a “big red button” that would let the human operator of an AI agent suspend its functions, even if the agent became smart enough to realize such a mechanism existed. The paper, titled “Safely Interruptible Agents,” does not Go so far as to position itself as the artery to counter a runaway superintelligence, but it’s a step in the birthright direction as far as Tesla CEO Musk is concerned: He recently implied that Google is the “one” company whose AI efforts preserve him awake at night.
Interestingly, during the identical interview with Recode, Musk suggested that OpenAI — an organization he backs that operates a grass-roots application to fabricate AI technology widely available to everyone — could be the ultimate antidote to a malevolent AI agent. If everyone possessed their own personal AI, he reckons, “if somebody did try to something really terrible, then the collective will of others could overcome that depraved actor.”
Perhaps they will develop a tough AI. Perhaps it won’t be friendly. Perhaps they will be pushed to extinction by Skynet, offered a tenuous, uneasy truce by the machines of The Matrix, or simply ignored and left to their own (less intelligent) devices by the superintelligent OS One from Her.
Or perhaps, to quote computer scientist and AI skeptic Peter Hassan, they will simply preserve “pursuing an ever-increasing number of immaterial activities as the original goal recedes ever further into the future — enjoy the mirage it is.”
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12833842
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12941827
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2018/01/pass4sure-c4040-122-dumps-and-practice.html
Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2Ji
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/5fjme1gara0ky8yatmh22lz6wer96tn3