Latest Pass4sure A2040-405 questions for New Syllabus | braindumps | ROMULUS

Experience our latest and invigorated A2040-405 Questions and Answers phenomenally assembled from test takers - containing practice questions - VCE and examcollection - braindumps - ROMULUS

Pass4sure A2040-405 dumps | A2040-405 true questions |

A2040-405 Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 social Edition System Administration U

Study usher Prepared by IBM Dumps Experts

Exam Questions Updated On : A2040-405 Dumps and true Questions

100% true Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

A2040-405 exam Dumps Source : Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 social Edition System Administration U

Test Code : A2040-405
Test cognomen : Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 social Edition System Administration U
Vendor cognomen : IBM
: 96 true Questions

simply utilize these actual question bank and fulfillment is yours.
started out getting ready for the difficult A2040-405 exam the utilize of the massive and voluminous study books. but failed tocrack the tough topics and got panicked. i was about to drop the exam whilst any individual stated me the dumpwith the aid of killexams. It was virtually smooth to study and the fact that I may want to memorize grievous in a brief time, removed grievous my apprehensions. ought to crack 67 questions in only 76 mins and got a stout eighty five marks. Felt indebted to for making my day.

just depend upon this A2040-405 actual question source.
i bought this because of the A2040-405 questions, I notion I ought to accomplish the QAs element just based on my previous experience. yet, the A2040-405 questions supplied by means of accommodate been simply as useful. so you actually necessity centered prep materials, I passed easily, grievous course to

preparing A2040-405 exam is dependence of some hours now.
Mysteriously I answerered grievous questions in this exam. lots obliged its miles a incredible asset for passing test. I counsel absolutely everyone to virtually utilize I examine numerous books however not notedto accumulate it. anyhow in the wake of the utilize of Questions & answers, i discovered the instantly forwardness in making plans question and solutions for the A2040-405 exam. I noticed grievous of the issues rightly.

These A2040-405 dumps works distinguished in the true test.
Every subject import and area, each situation of affairs, A2040-405 materials had been brilliant encourage for me even asgetting ready for this exam and in reality doing it! I used to be concerned, but going once more to this A2040-405 and questioning that I realize everything due to the verisimilitude the A2040-405 exam was very smooth after the stuff, I got an first rate quit result. Now, doing the following degree of IBM certifications.

here are hints & hints with dumps to certify A2040-405 examination with excessive scores.
A2040-405 exam accommodate become truly tough for me as i used to be not getting enough time for the training. Finding no course out, I took encourage from the sell off. I additionally took encourage from expert Certification guide. The sell off changed into top notch. It dealt with grievous of the subjects in an facile and fine manner. Could accumulate thru most of them with runt attempt. Spoke back grievous the question in handiest eighty one minutes and accommodate been given 97 mark. Felt sincerely glad. Thank you a lot to for his or her valuable steering.

Do you necessity updated dumps for A2040-405 exam? Here it is. questions and answers helped me to recognize what precisely is predicted in the exam A2040-405. I organized rightly inside 10 days of instruction and finished grievous of the questions of exam in 80 mins. It incorporate the subjects similar to exam factor of view and makes you memorize grievous of the topics without vicissitude and correctly. It also helped me to recognize a course to control the time to complete the exam before time. It is best method.

Can I accumulate latest dumps with true Q & A of A2040-405 exam?
The best preparation I accommodate ever experienced. I took many A2040-405 certification exams, but A2040-405 turned out to be the easiest one thanks to I accommodate recently discovered this website and wish I knew about it a few years ago. Would accommodate saved me a lot of sleepless nights and grey hair! The A2040-405 exam is not an facile one, especially its latest version. But the A2040-405 Q and A includes the latest questions, daily updates, and these are absolutely unquestionable and sound questions. I am convinced this is suitable cause I got most of them during my exam. I got an excellent score and thank to making A2040-405 exam stress-free.

What is needed to study for A2040-405 exam?
Determined out this particular source after a long term. grievous and sundry privilege here is cooperative and in a position. Crew provided me exquisite dump for A2040-405 schooling.

Where should I register for A2040-405 exam?
This exam instruction package covered the questions i was asked at the exam - a few thing I didnt be given as true with might be viable. So the stuff they provide is in fact valid. It appears to be often updated to holdup with the professional updates made to A2040-405 exam. Superb first-class, the attempting out engine runs effortlessly and can be very consumer pleasant. there is not anything I dont like approximately it.

Start preparing these A2040-405 questions answers and chillout.
I got this p.C. And passed the A2040-405 exam with 97% marks after 10 days. I am extraordinarily fulfilled by using the conclude result. There can be brilliant stuff for companion flat confirmations, yet concerning the expert level, I believe that is the principle tough course of action for first-class stuff, mainly with the exam simulator that gives you a danger to exercise with the appearance and flavor of a true exam. This is a completely substantial brain dump, unquestionable examine guide. This is elusive for reducing side test.

IBM Assessment: IBM Notes and

IBM Cloud, Watson: suffering from OS/2 Warp Deja Vu? | true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

IBM’s newest quarterly monetary consequences strengthen a growing subject: The know-how giant may additionally subsequently gyrate into an also-ran in the cloud computing and synthetic intelligence markets. The present enterprise situation is a runt bit akin to IBM in the Nineties — which tried and didn't create OS/2 the favored software platform for client-server computing — subsequently losing out to home windows pcs along with windows NT and Linux servers.

IBM CEO Ginni Rometty

part of IBM’s current issue includes the course it reviews economic consequences. with the aid of lumping collectively cloud and cognitive software revenue into one line item, the company may additionally truly be undermining a comparatively first rate (although far from stellar) cloud story.

For its Q1 of fiscal 2019, IBM the day past mentioned:

  • complete earnings of $18.182 billion, down from $19.072 billion within the corresponding quarter final yr.
  • Cloud and cognitive utility profits of $5.037 billion, down from $5.116 billion. (be aware: reading that one line, some media reports erroneously spoke of cloud revenues had been down. truly, the cloud revenues rose — which implies the cognitive piece of the enterprise is a laggard, even challenging IBM says cognitive functions revenues grew 4 p.c.)
  • internet income of $1.591 billion, down from $1.679 billion.
  • The salary beat Wall road’s expectations, however revenues accommodate been in necessity of analyst expectations, SeekingAlpha says.

    IBM growth moves: blended consequences

    IBM CEO Ginni Rometty on account that 2012 has been reshaping the enterprise for boom markets equivalent to cloud capabilities, cognitive computing, cell, security and greater. IBM has also been selling off slow-growth or no-boom utility companies.

    The enterprise’s current status, commonly speakme, hasn’t impressed me. among the explanations:

  • Gartner says the global public cloud market will grow 17.three % in 2019. however IBM’s annual as-a-carrier evade price grew handiest 10 percent year-over-year in Q1 2019. AWS and Azure are better and are starting to be far more swiftly.
  • The synthetic intelligence market is anticipated to exceed $191 billion by means of 2024, representing a compound annual growth price of 37 % from about 2018, in keeping with this record. And yet it’s protected to assert that IBM’s personal cognitive software revenues were enormously flat and even perhaps down in some areas.
  • next Up: purple Hat received’t reclaim IBM

    Amazon web services and Microsoft Azure are working away with the public cloud market, while Google Cloud Platform is as a minimum giving chase with some new and ingenious MSP-oriented moves.

    consequently, many ISVs (impartial application vendors) and MSPs are embracing multi-cloud administration ideas that extend across AWS and Azure — and, more and more, Google. IBM sometimes pops up in that multi-cloud management dialog — however now not generally enough, personally.

    IBM’s respond to the cloud challenge includes purchasing red Hat for hybrid-cloud application. The theory: crimson Hat industry Linux (RHEL) is terribly common inside on-premises statistics centers and across public clouds. purchasing purple Hat, for this reason, offers IBM hasty credibility as a multi-cloud and hybrid cloud utility provider.

    That’s proper. but there are three complications with the IBM-crimson Hat approach:

    Challenges and alternatives

    a number of bottom-line realities are rather clear:

    In different words, IBM leaders neglected the most critical factor of the cloud age — they didn’t create Watson convenient to devour.

    OS/2 Warp Deja Vu?: For me, it’s a case of deja vu. Roughly 25 years in the past, IBM OS/2 may accommodate been the strongest operating device in the marketplace. however the premiere technology didn’t win as a result of (A) it changed into problematic to installation/devour and (B) lacked ISV help. quick ahead to current day, and identical traits are surfacing with IBM Cloud and Watson — principally as ISVs drove to Azure and AWS.

    When OS/2’s restricted alternatives became clear, IBM went out and bought Lotus Notes to circulation into the sooner-increase groupware collaboration market. It become a very well-behaved flow for a few decade — unless Microsoft trade Server finally crushed IBM in that sector.

    IBM: the place’s the Killer concept?

    quickly ahead to current day. IBM has practically misplaced the public cloud wars, and may purchase crimson Hat to try and win the hybrid cloud wars. Amid grievous that, IBM’s overall industry is preserving up fairly neatly. overall cloud revenues are becoming.

    IBM CFO James Kavanaugh

    first rate earnings and money crawl will fund R&D, and there are further opportunities on the horizon. Chief among them: Areas like Blockchain and protection.

    In security, IBM delivered double-digit growth in Q1 2019, and has well-behaved traction with possibility administration utility and functions choices, together with QRadar and Resilient, CFO Jim Kavanaugh said grievous over the day gone by’s income name. additionally, IBM’s security intelligence operations and consulting functions, which notice and respond to security threats for shoppers, are gaining momentum, he added.

    these are promising anecdotes. however usual, it’s pellucid to me that IBM’s so-called strategic imperatives haven’t absolutely paid off for the enterprise, its customers or its companions.

    Can IBM's World Wire be The respond To Cryptocurrency funds Or can they necessity more alternate options? | true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    If cryptocurrencies had been the flavour of 2017, and 2019 is grievous about commercial enterprise blockchain usage, then it is also vital to be conscious the taciturn amalgamation of these two that has been bubbling below: the institutionalised pass-border blockchain price answer.

    everybody knows that one in grievous Bitcoin’s most massive assets is its without frontier lines nature and that it can also be used as a go-border price answer. although, the decentralized nature of Bitcoin has hamstrung its frequent adoption somewhat, and several agencies accommodate accordingly spotted a niche in the habitual market.

    First, there turned into Ripple, one in every of most efficacious three blockchain-first agencies that turned into lately named within the Forbes Blockchain 50 checklist, that has made its mandate to companion with great and institutionalised fiscal institutions and banks. Ripple has, as of January this yr, introduced over 200 partnerships with well universal monetary associations to present go-border charge solutions.

    Ripple, as a blockchain-first startup, turned into grievous the time in hazard of being usurped by course of trendy and tough names coming in to lift its market. Some believe this has already came about. JP Morgan Chase this 12 months also introduced its personal blockchain-primarily based move-border charge solution experiment, the JPM Coin.

    The competitive fight for a potential and doable solution has persevered as blockchain backer IBM has also attain forward with their personal solution, the Blockchain World Wire. IBM already has a considerable stake in the burgeoning blockchain market with Hyperledger fabric essentially the most-used in the Forbes Blockchain 50 record, accounting for 26.

    So, the race is on to give a move-border blockchain price solution, but are these enterprise companies lacking the notice a bit of, and even missing their key market wholly? Many organizations and agencies may note the cost in the utilize of IBM’s answer, whereas the person in the street, who's bored inelastic with the orthodox monetary gadget, might possibly be extra inclined to utilize decentralised alternatives like Bitcoin.

    however where is the attainable, facile to create utilize of, person-friendly option that makes cryptocurrencies and their travel brink competencies purchasable for all?

    professionals and Cons

    looking down the line of Ripple, JPM Coin, and World Wire, they are able to note privilege away that these cross-border payments are grievous vying for a similar market. Ripple desires to be the go-to for banks, JPM coin is born of a bank, and even the world Wire respond has purposes predominantly for fiscal and enterprise institutions.

    None of these options are designed for the different facet of the market; the buyers and the people who are looking to be able to profit on the effectivity and affordability of sending money across borders throughout the blockchain.

    Now, many here will relate Bitcoin, and other cryptocurrencies, fill this niche; they're paraphernalia for the people and reputed to aid people who are looking to travail backyard of the orthodox fiscal regime. but, it ought to also be remembered that cryptocurrency adoption is nowhere near broad enough to attain essential mass.

    It capacity that on the one conclusion, the site JPM Coin and World Wire locate themselves, there are efficacious ties to the natural banking programs and the twinge aspects that brings - when it comes to paperwork, legacy and shortage of innovation. Then, however, there is the decentralised cryptocurrency sphere which quiet has a great ‘Wild West’ recognition, this leaves a vast market stranded within the middle.

    “The greatest barrier for anything like World Wire to accumulate off the ground is the orthodox banking paraphernalia and its resistance to innovation,” explains Elizabeth White of The White company, a company attempting to supply cryptocurrency options that attraction to both patrons and corporations.

    “large intentional banks were using programs like SWIFT for decades and accommodate entire ‘wire departments’ committed to processing transactions. while blockchain would significantly modernize, automate, at ease and precipitate up the complete method, it would require retraining and reworking a fiscal institution's complete operations to implement,” White spoke of.

    “IBM is using World Wire to compete with SWIFT for foreign fiscal institution transfers. whereas the system has loads of skills and has a suitable casual of supplanting SWIFT; people or organizations can not utilize World Wire, so that they would nevertheless should travel during the measure banking process to ship international payments.”

    “for a lot of banks, piteous to XRP, JPM Coin, or World Wire just isn't worth it because their consumers are not yet demanding the pace and competitively priced of blockchain transactions, and basically banks are making loads of revenue on wire charges and so forth.”

    “there's additionally some presentiment amongst many banking gurus about using ‘blockchain’ as a result of lamentably there are rather just a few that nonetheless don't bear in intelligence the technology and may even associate blockchain with money laundering, fully lacking the stout anti-fraud prevention benefits of allotted ledger.”

    A hybrid equipment

    The evolution of the cryptocurrency space has been necessitated thanks to its turbulent and tumultuous previous. It began as this magical internet funds that might disrupt every sector imaginable and caught the imagination of swaths of americans, but it additionally opened the doors for fraudsters, scammers, and speculators.

    The backlash has been a an Awful lot more controlled, regulated and measured method into 2019. This has opened one more door for the industry businesses and principal associations to relate in, but these polarised aspects accommodate left a great hole open within the middle.

    It is that this seat floor of ‘no-coiners’ that continue to be, ready to be roped in... most likely when the confiscate paraphernalia comes alongside, and that system is a doubtlessly compund of the two facets we've now.

    White, and the White company, conform with they are on the privilege song to attain this left over goal market as they're proposing stability and safety of most principal fiscal associations thanks to providing things like assurance from a massive UK bank Lloyds, as well as applying a blockchain, Stellar, which is additionally backed by means of IBM.

    however, they also feel that the providing of an facile to create utilize of and user-friendly front conclusion, with a solid coin, and alternatives to trade other cryptos, will aid entice even more clients.

    “Our funds platform, as an example, is developed on Stellar, which is a committed funds protocol supported by using IBM, Deloitte, Stripe and others, and is focused on optimizing pace and effectivity of funds,” provides White.

    if it is to be looked at throughout a spectrum - decentralised cryptocurrencies on one conclusion, enterprise cross-border blockchain solutions on the other - a seat ground needs to be constructed and based. clients want the safety of banks and fiscal associations, devoid of the bureaucracy and legacy associated with it.

    A course to the long run

    it's fairly agreeable that blockchain tokens, digital assets, cryptocurrencies, or some thing type of label lands on them, are the longer term. but that future is quiet being laid out via the fiscal giants, as neatly because the decentralised communities.

    There does although deserve to be a center-out enlarge that will aid entice the stout majority of clients into this new and mainly misunderstood space. If the corporations are looking for themselves and different massive companies, and the cryptocurrencies are getting used by those in the be conscious of, the site is the ‘iPhone second’ that turns cryptos onto the mainstream?

    IBM Shares Down After income omit | true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Shares of IBM had been down sharply in midday buying and selling after the enterprise mentioned mixed revenue outcomes Tuesday.

    The company’s profits became down practically 5% yr-over-yr, with every enterprise aspect down or flat, however the company talked about that cloud earnings boom accelerated within the quarter and was up 10% over the ultimate twelve months at $19.5 billion.

    IBM pronounced income of $2.25 per share, compared with $2.22 per participate expected by course of analysts, in response to Refinitiv. The company suggested earnings of $18.18 billion, in comparison with $18.forty six billion expected by course of analysts, in response to Refinitiv.

    The enterprise said it returned $2.3 billion to shareholders.

    “within the first quarter, their cloud income growth accelerated, and they once more grew in key, high-price areas in cloud and cognitive software and in consulting,” chairman and CEO Ginni Rometty pointed out in a statement. “IBM’s investments in creative technologies coupled with their industry talents and their commitment to believe and protection position us well to encourage consumers movement to chapter two of their digital reinvention.”

    IBM reiterated its advice of at least $13.90 in profits per participate for 2019. Analysts surveyed by course of Refinitive anticipated $13.91 in earnings per participate for the 12 months.

    The enterprise’s stock is up practically 28% because the starting of the year.

    In October, IBM introduced it was acquiring open-supply application and know-how distributor purple Hat in a deal valued at about $34 billion.

    That deal, after which red Hat would gyrate into a unit of IBM’s Hybrid Cloud division, is expected to proximate in the 2d half of the yr.

    “IBM is profitable new, even cloud-native, customers before pink Hat,” analysts at Nomura Instinet wrote in a solemnize to purchasers on April 9. “OpenShift [a Red Hat product] should support IBM win new customers and new workloads as organisations start to usher mission-essential functions from on-premise to public or deepest clouds.”


    Obviously it is hard assignment to pick solid certification questions/answers assets concerning review, reputation and validity since individuals accumulate sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report objection customers attain to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effectively. They never trade off on their review, reputation and character because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer conviction is vital to us. Uniquely they deal with review, reputation, sham report grievance, trust, validity, report and scam. In the event that you note any mistaken report posted by their rivals with the cognomen killexams sham report grievance web, sham report, scam, dissension or something like this, simply recall there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of well-behaved administrations because of their advantages. There are a distinguished many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their specimen questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Braindumps Menu

    000-602 exercise questions | 000-854 dump | 102-400 true questions | C2010-655 free pdf | 000-975 study guide | P9530-039 cram | LOT-409 true questions | LOT-986 questions and answers | HPE6-A47 test prep | HP0-850 braindumps | CPIM-BSP exercise test | 70-339 free pdf | CCB-400 test prep | LE0-583 brain dumps | M2040-669 free pdf | 70-348 true questions | A2180-271 bootcamp | 310-560 test questions | C2150-612 mock exam | SQ0-101 examcollection |

    Get high marks in A2040-405 exam with these dumps
    We accommodate Tested and Approved A2040-405 Exams believe about aides and brain dumps. gives the redress and latest true questions with braindumps which basically accommodate grievous data that you accommodate to pass the A2040-405 exam. With the usher of their A2040-405 exam materials, you dont necessity to misuse your casual on scrutinizing reference books however just necessity to consume 10-20 hours to retain their A2040-405 true questions and answers.

    As the most issue that's in any capability vital here is passing the A2040-405 - Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 social Edition System Administration U test. As grievous that you just necessity will be a high score of IBM A2040-405 exam. the solesolitary issue you wish to try to is downloading braindumps of A2040-405 exam. they are not letting you down and they will accomplish every encourage to you pass your A2040-405 exam. The specialists in like manner retain step with the foremost best at school test to submission most of updated dumps. 3 Months free access to possess the power to them through the date of purchase. each candidate will bear the price of the A2040-405 exam dumps through requiring very runt to no effort. there's no risk concerned the least bit. Inside seeing the existent braindumps of the brain dumps at you will be able to feel confident about the A2040-405 topics. For the IT specialists, It is basic to reinforce their capacities as showed by their travail capabilities. they accommodate an approach to build it basic for their customers to hold certification test with the assistance of confirmed and honest to goodness braindumps. For AN awing future in its domain, their brain dumps are the most efficacious call. Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for grievous exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for grievous Orders A best dumps making will be a basic section that creates it simple for you to require IBM certifications. In any case, A2040-405 braindumps PDF offers settlement for candidates. The IT assertion will be a vital hard try if one does not realize true course as obvious exercise test. Thus, they accommodate got true and updated dumps for the composition of certification test.

    We accommodate their professionals operating consistently for the gathering of actual exam questions of A2040-405. grievous the pass4sure questions and answers of A2040-405 collected by means of their organization are inspected and updated by means of their A2040-405 ensured group. They remain related to the competition showed up in the A2040-405 test to accumulate their reviews about the A2040-405 exam, they acquire A2040-405 exam hints and traps, their revel in approximately the techniques utilized as a fragment of the actual A2040-405 exam, the mix-usathey completed inside the true test and after that enhance their material appropriately. When you like their pass4sure questions and answers, you'll feel positive approximately every one of the topics of test and feel that your perception has been enormously progressed. These pass4sure questions and answers are not surely hone questions, those are actual exam questions and answers which will be enough to pass the A2040-405 exam in the climb attempt.

    IBM certifications are very required crosswise over IT institutions. HR directors gaunt in the direction of applicants who've a comprehension of the subject matter, in addition to having finished certification exams in the situation. grievous the IBM certification encourage supplied on are recounted round the arena.

    It is actual to mention that you are attempting to find true exams questions and answers for the Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 social Edition System Administration U exam? They are privilege here to proffer you one most up to date and first-class assets that is, They accommodate amassed a database of questions from actual test with a purpose to provide you with a risk free blueprint and pass A2040-405 exam on the major undertaking. grievous training materials at the web site are innovative and checked via certified professionals.

    Why is the Ultimate selection for affirmation planning?

    1. A satisfactory kick that encourage You Prepare for Your Exam: is a definitive making plans hotspot for passing the IBM A2040-405 exam. They accommodate deliberately consented and collected true exam questions and answers, which are up to date with an indistinguishable recurrence from actual exam is up to date, and investigated through enterprise specialists. Their IBM licensed experts from severa associations are capable and certified/confirmed humans who accommodate investigated every inquiry and respond and explanation segment maintaining in intelligence the cease aim to allow you to comprehend the notion and pass the IBM exam. The maximum flawless approach to blueprint A2040-405 exam isnt perusing a route reading, however taking exercise actual questions and information the proper answers. exercise questions encourage set you up for the thoughts, as well as the approach in which questions and respond picks are introduced amid the true exam.

    2. facile to recognize Mobile Device Access:

    killexams provide to a splendid diploma smooth to apply accumulate privilege of entry to items. The concentration of the site is to present genuine, updated, and to the direct material toward enable you to accommodate a spy at and pass the A2040-405 exam. You can rapidly find the actual questions and respond database. The website is springy amicable to allow prep anywhere, so long as you've got internet affiliation. You can really stack the PDF in portable and concentrate wherever.

    three. Access the Most Recent Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 social Edition System Administration U true Questions and Answers:

    Our Exam databases are often updated for the duration of the time to involve the maximum current true questions and answers from the IBM A2040-405 exam. Having Accurate, actual and modern-day actual exam questions, you may pass your exam on the main try!

    4. Their Materials is Verified through Industry Experts:

    We are doing struggle to giving you actual Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 social Edition System Administration U exam questions and answers, alongside explanations. Each on has been showed by IBM certified professionals. They are rather qualified and confirmed humans, who've severa times of professional revel in identified with the IBM exams.

    5. They Provide grievous Exam Questions and involve minute Answers with Explanations:

    Not at grievous like numerous other exam prep web sites, gives updated actual IBM A2040-405 exam questions, in addition to nitty gritty answers, explanations and charts. This is principal to encourage the hopeful understand the proper answer, in addition to knowledges approximately the options that were incorrect. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as beneath;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for grievous exams on internet site
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for grievous Orders

    A2040-405 Practice Test | A2040-405 examcollection | A2040-405 VCE | A2040-405 study guide | A2040-405 practice exam | A2040-405 cram

    Killexams SPS-202 sample test | Killexams 98-375 exercise questions | Killexams 9A0-054 VCE | Killexams HP0-S23 study guide | Killexams M9510-664 braindumps | Killexams DAT free pdf | Killexams 132-S-916-2 braindumps | Killexams A2090-463 study guide | Killexams 000-052 free pdf download | Killexams 000-771 exercise questions | Killexams 500-051 pdf download | Killexams C2180-279 brain dumps | Killexams NS0-320 questions and answers | Killexams 644-066 exercise exam | Killexams 250-402 exercise test | Killexams 70-516-VB exam prep | Killexams 000-533 test prep | Killexams C2140-842 questions and answers | Killexams HP2-K24 braindumps | Killexams 920-340 mock exam | huge List of Exam Braindumps

    View Complete list of Brain dumps

    Killexams 1Z0-858 exam prep | Killexams 000-M11 braindumps | Killexams 000-540 true questions | Killexams E20-350 test prep | Killexams HH0-220 questions and answers | Killexams 922-099 free pdf | Killexams QQ0-401 braindumps | Killexams 310-019 exam prep | Killexams 000-371 dump | Killexams 000-130 braindumps | Killexams 000-280 study guide | Killexams 000-842 exercise questions | Killexams HP2-N35 exercise test | Killexams NS0-156 true questions | Killexams C2050-219 free pdf download | Killexams 200-047 exercise test | Killexams 250-308 exercise Test | Killexams CSSLP exam questions | Killexams M2150-756 brain dumps | Killexams 1Z1-052 true questions |

    Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 social Edition System Administration U

    Pass 4 sure A2040-405 dumps | A2040-405 true questions |

    IBM Drops Lotus Brand, Takes Notes and Domino Forward | true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    First Name: Last Name: E-mail Address: Password: Confirm Password: Username:

    Title: C-Level/President Manager VP Staff (Associate/Analyst/etc.) Director


    Role in IT decision-making process: Align industry & IT Goals Create IT Strategy Determine IT Needs Manage Vendor Relationships Evaluate/Specify Brands or Vendors Other Role commission Purchases Not Involved

    Work Phone: Company: Company Size: Industry: Street Address City: Zip/postal code State/Province: Country:

    Occasionally, they send subscribers special offers from select partners. Would you like to receive these special colleague offers via e-mail? Yes No

    Your registration with Eweek will involve the following free email newsletter(s): intelligence & Views

    By submitting your wireless number, you conform that eWEEK, its related properties, and vendor partners providing content you view may contact you using contact seat technology. Your consent is not required to view content or utilize site features.

    By clicking on the "Register" button below, I conform that I accommodate carefully read the Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy and I conform to be legally bound by grievous such terms.


    Continue without consent      

    App evolution tools ease crawl to the Web | true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    App evolution tools ease crawl to the Web
  • By Barbara Depompa Reimers
  • Apr 19, 1998
  • Organizations such as Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, Calif., accommodate organize that one appliance won't fill grievous their needs. As a result, vendors accommodate begun to assemble groups of tools, such as Microsoft Corp.'s Visual Studio, IBM Corp.'s Visual Age and Sybase Inc.'s PowerStudio.

    "The best tools enable users to participate information and components, not just a common spy and feel," said Steve Clark, vice president of enterprise application evolution tools at Sybase, Emeryville, Calif.

    Los Alamos runs a broad coalesce of systems, databases and desktop client systems. For several years Los Alamos has turned to PowerBuilder, from Sybase's Powersoft Division, to build client/server applications.

    One of these applications, a procurement program called Procurement Desktop, developed by American Management Systems Inc. (AMS), Fairfax, Va., was renovated extensively so the requisitioning, workflow and reporting components could be migrated to the Web.

    The contracting module was not converted because only 100 users write contracts. Instead, grievous 7,000 users at Los Alamos wanted to order supplies, check on the status of orders or monitor their supply expenses.

    "They needed access to subsets of the function in [the] procurement application to gain better insights into their procurement needs," said Jeff Modell, Los Alamos' AMS project manager.

    Because the users had a variety of client systems with Windows, Unix and Macintosh operating systems, a new solution had to be found. "We moved the key pieces of the PowerBuilder code to a middle tier and then developed a front conclude in Java," Modell said. That way, grievous the users could evade the application through their browsers and access the procurement application functions, which now reside as PowerBuilder components, on an application server. Meanwhile, the comfort of the procurement application remains on a back-end relational database.

    Los Alamos renovated its procurement application with the encourage of at least three PowerBuilder tools that accommodate since evolved into Sybase PowerStudio. The Sybase PowerJ Java tool, for example, enabled Los Alamos to "write once and debug everywhere, which is quiet simpler than writing the code over and over for each client platform," Modell said.

    And Los Alamos also incorporated a middle-tier transaction server, Sybase's Jaguar, to ply industry transactions of the system.

    The Flexibility Factor

    The advantages of the Internet and intranets in terms of cost, precipitate and flexibility accommodate led to an explosion of their use. International Data Corp., a Framingham, Mass.-based market research firm, predicts there will be 133 million intranet users worldwide by 2001. Also, 59 percent of U.S. organizations accommodate an intranet, and by year's conclude that is expected to enlarge to 77 percent.

    Web deployment of former client/server-based applications is profitable because it makes an application accessible to multiple client platforms, eliminating the necessity to worry about Windows 95 vs. Windows NT or Unix clients. This cross-platform functionality enables users to access functions from anywhere, unlike a traditional client/server environment.

    Also in contrast to client/server applications, grievous changes to an application on the Web can be done on the Web server, which saves time and resources because newly coded programs don't necessity to be loaded on each desktop system. Instead, the browser on each client system allows applications to be evade over any Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol network from the Web server. This feature is what has enabled the Department of Housing and Urban evolution to develop and maintain a Web-based list of lead assessment and abatement contractors in the ultimate two years.

    The information on certified contractors in grievous 50 states is compiled daily from data collected in a variety of formats— including client/server databases and even Microsoft Word documents— from each state. HUD provides this critical information to the public via the Web, and there is also special phone and fax access to update the public about new contractors and regulations regarding lead levels.

    When the project was started more than two years ago, Lotus evolution Corp.'s Notes and its Domino evolution environment "provided the only trustworthy means to compile the information from each situation and translate that into [Hypertext Markup Language]-readable pages on their Web site," said Matthew Ammon, technical assistance specialist for HUD's Office of Lead Hazard Control.

    Several vendors said there is almost no disagreement in programming when a user deploys an application on the Web vs. on a measure client/server platform.

    Oracle Corp.'s Designer/2000, for example, was built for developing client/server and Web applications, said Abinash Tripathy, technologist at Oracle Government, Education and Health, Bethesda, Md. Programmers accomplish not necessity to write additional code to deploy a client/server application on the Web. Of course, this means Web applications accomplish not support any platform-specific standards, such as Microsoft's kick Linking and Embedding technology.

    "Oracle's goal is to be able to evade on any hardware/OS platform that supports Java," Tripathy said.

    Depending on an agency's needs, Web-enabling a mainframe-based application may lift site even before the application can be re-engineered for client/server deployment. The Government Printing Office, for example, has taken a legacy requisition system and deployed it on the Web, replacing the mainframe-based, green-screen technology with a new graphical user interface.

    "This way, they can leverage their mainframe systems investment and supplant older applications in an methodical vogue while at the same time extending their life and usefulness via Web deployment," said Pat Gardner, director of GPO's Office of Information Resources Management.

    TransCanada Reports tough Second Quarter 2017 fiscal Results; Performance Highlights Diversified, Low Risk industry Strategy | true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwired - Jul 28, 2017) - TransCanada Corporation (TRP)(TRP) (TransCanada or the Company) today announced net income attributable to common shares for second quarter 2017 of $881 million or $1.01 per participate compared to net income of $365 million or $0.52 per participate for the same age in 2016. Comparable earnings for second quarter 2017 were $659 million or $0.76 per participate compared to $366 million or $0.52 per participate for the same age in 2016. TransCanada's Board of Directors also declared a quarterly dividend of $0.625 per common participate for the quarter ending September 30, 2017, equivalent to $2.50 per common participate on an annualized basis.

    "Our diversified portfolio of high-quality, low risk energy infrastructure assets continued to effect very well in the second quarter of 2017," said Russ Girling, TransCanada's president and chief executive officer. "Comparable earnings per participate increased 46 per cent compared to second quarter 2016 primarily due to the Columbia acquisition in July 2016 and the realization of associated synergies, tough performance across their Natural Gas and Liquids Pipelines businesses and higher earnings from Bruce Power following a major planned outage in second quarter 2016. The growth in earnings was accompanied by a significant enlarge in net cash provided by operations which rose to $1.4 billion from $1.1 billion in the same age ultimate year."

    "In the quarter, they added $2 billion of additional expansion projects on the NGTL System and today announced a $0.2 billion expansion on the Canadian Mainline, highlighting the organic growth opportunities that continue to emanate from their broad, strategically located asset base. They are now advancing a $24 billion near-term capital program that is expected to generate significant growth in earnings and cash flow and support an expected annual dividend growth rate at the upper conclude of an eight to 10 per cent attain through 2020," added Girling. "To date they accommodate invested $9.0 billion in these projects and are well positioned to both execute and fund the comfort of the program over the next few years. In addition, they concluded the sale of their U.S. Northeast merchant generation facilities, with proceeds used to fully retire the Columbia acquisition bridge facilities. With those sales complete, over 95 per cent of their future EBITDA is expected to be derived from regulated or long-term contracted assets."

    "We also continue to progress a number of additional medium to longer-term organic growth opportunities in their three core businesses of natural gas pipelines, liquids pipelines and energy in Canada, the United States and Mexico. Success in advancing Keystone XL or other growth initiatives, including the Bruce Power life extension, could further augment or extend the Company's dividend growth outlook," concluded Girling.

    (All fiscal figures are unaudited and in Canadian dollars unless preeminent otherwise)

    Net income attributable to common shares increased by $516 million to $881 million or $1.01 per participate for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same age ultimate year. Net income per common participate in 2017 includes the dilutive result of issuing 161 million common shares in 2016. Second quarter 2017 results included a $265 million after-tax net gain on the monetization of the U.S. Northeast power assets which was comprised of a $441 million after-tax gain on the sale of TC Hydro and an incremental loss of $176 million after-tax on the sale of the thermal and wind package, an after-tax charge of $15 million for integration-related costs associated with the acquisition of Columbia and a $4 million after-tax charge related to the maintenance of Keystone XL assets. Second quarter 2016 included a charge of $113 million related to costs associated with the Columbia acquisition which were primarily related to the dividend equivalent payments on the subscription receipts issued as fragment of the permanent financing of the transaction, an after-tax $10 million restructuring charge related to expected future losses under lease commitments and $9 million after-tax related to Keystone XL maintenance and liquidation costs. grievous of these specific items as well as unrealized gains and losses from changes in risk management activities are excluded from comparable earnings.

    Comparable earnings for second quarter 2017 were $659 million or $0.76 per participate compared to $366 million or $0.52 per participate for the same age in 2016, an enlarge of $293 million or $0.24 per participate and includes the dilutive result of issuing 161 million common shares in 2016. The enlarge in second quarter comparable earnings was primarily due to higher contributions from U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines reflecting incremental earnings from Columbia following the July 1, 2016 acquisition and higher ANR transportation revenues resulting from higher rates efficacious August 1, 2016, higher earnings from Bruce Power mainly due to higher volumes resulting from fewer planned outage days, a higher contribution from Mexican Natural Gas Pipelines due to earnings from the Mazatlán and Topolobampo pipelines and higher earnings from Liquids Pipelines mainly due to higher volumes. These increases were partially offset by higher interest expense mainly as a result of debt assumed in the acquisition of Columbia and long-term debt issuances.

    Notable recent developments include:

    Natural Gas Pipelines:

  • NGTL System: In June, they announced an additional $2 billion expansion program, subject to regulatory approvals, supported by new contracted customer demand for approximately 3 Bcf/d of incremental hard receipt and delivery services. The expansion will also enlarge delivery capacity at the Alberta/British Columbia export delivery point by 381 MMcf/d to serve markets in the Pacific Northwest, California and Nevada. NGTL now has a $7.1 billion near-term capital program targeted for completion by 2021.
  • Canadian Mainline Tolling Option Open Season: In April, an application was filed with the National Energy Board (NEB) for approval of the long-term fixed-price service from the Empress receipt point in Alberta to the Dawn hub in Southern Ontario. The NEB is following a modified Streamlined Application Process with adjudication expected to succeed after oral arguments are presented on September 11, 2017. The new service is requested to originate November 1, 2017.
  • Canadian Mainline Maple Compressor Expansion Project: The Canadian Mainline has received requests for expansion capacity to the southern Ontario market plus delivery to Atlantic Canada via the TQM and PNGTS systems. The requests for approximately 80 MMcf/d of hard service underpin the necessity for new compression at the existing Maple compressor site. Customers accommodate executed 15-year precedent agreements to proceed with the estimated $160 million project. Once they accommodate completed their tariff process for this capacity addition, an application to the NEB for approval to proceed with the project is planned for early 2018 to meet a November 1, 2019 in-service date.
  • Coastal GasLink: The continuing slow in the Final Investment determination (FID) for the LNG Canada project has triggered a restructuring of provisions in the Coastal GasLink project agreement with LNG Canada that will result in the payment of inescapable amounts to TransCanada with respect to carrying charges on costs incurred since inception of the project. An approximate $80 million payment will be received in September 2017, followed by quarterly payments of approximately $7 million until further notice. They continue to travail with LNG Canada under the agreement towards a FID.
  • Prince Rupert Gas Transmission: On July 25, 2017, they were notified that PNW LNG would not be proceeding with their proposed LNG project. As fragment of their PRGT agreement, following receipt of a termination notice, they would be reimbursed for the complete costs and carrying charges incurred to advance the PRGT project. They expect to receive this payment later in 2017.
  • Sale of Iroquois and PNGTS to TC PipeLines, LP: On June 1, 2017, they sold a 49.34 per cent interest in Iroquois, together with their remaining 11.81 per cent interest in PNGTS, to their master limited partnership, TC PipeLines, LP for a value of US$765 million.
  • Leach XPress and Rayne XPress: They continue to advance construction on the US$1.5 billion Leach XPress and the US$0.4 billion Rayne XPress projects. Both projects are expected to enter service in November 2017.
  • Liquids Pipelines:

  • Keystone XL: On July 27, 2017, they launched an open season to solicit additional binding commitments from interested parties for transportation of aboriginal oil on the Keystone Pipeline and for the Keystone XL Pipeline project from Hardisty, Alberta to markets in Cushing, Oklahoma and the U.S. Gulf Coast. The open season will proximate on September 28, 2017.
  • Grand Rapids: In June, the grand Rapids pipeline commenced line fill activities with anticipated in-service in third quarter 2017.
  • Energy:

  • Monetization of U.S. Northeast power business: On April 19, 2017, they closed the sale of TC Hydro to distinguished River Hydro, LLC for US$1.07 billion resulting in a gain of $717 million ($441 million after-tax) recorded in second quarter 2017. On June 2, 2017, they completed the sale of Ravenswood, Ironwood, Ocean situation Power and Kibby Wind to Helix Generation, LLC for US$2.029 billion. An additional loss of approximately $219 million ($176 million after-tax) was recorded in second quarter 2017, primarily related to an adjustment to the purchase price and repair costs for an unplanned outage at Ravenswood prior to close. Insurance recoveries for a portion of the repair costs are expected to be received by the conclude of 2017 which will partially reduce this loss. Proceeds from the sale transactions were used to fully retire the remaining bridge facilities that partially funded the acquisition of Columbia. They also initiated the monetization of their TransCanada Power Marketing Ltd. (TCPM) operations and will realize the value of the remaining marketing contracts and working capital over time.
  • Corporate:

  • Common participate Dividend: Their Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.625 per participate for the quarter ending September 30, 2017 on TransCanada's outstanding common shares. The quarterly amount is equivalent to $2.50 per common participate on an annualized basis.
  • Junior Subordinated Debt Issuance: In May 2017, TransCanada dependence issued $1.5 billion of 60-year Junior Subordinated Notes in Canada to third party investors with a fixed interest rate of 4.65 per cent for the first ten years converting to a floating rate thereafter. The notes are callable at par climb ten years following their issuance. grievous of the proceeds of the issuance by the dependence were loaned to TransCanada PipeLines Limited (TCPL) in $1.5 billion of subordinated notes at a rate of 4.90 per cent which includes a 0.25 per cent administration charge.
  • Financing at TC PipeLines, LP: In May 2017, TC PipeLines, LP raised US$500 million from issuance of 10-year senior unsecured notes mien an interest rate of 3.90 per cent.
  • Dividend Reinvestment blueprint (DRP): Based on the most recent quarter, approximately 35 per cent of the common participate dividends declared are being reinvested in TransCanada common shares through their DRP.
  • ATM Equity Issuance Program: In June 2017, they established an ATM program that allows us to issue common shares from treasury having an aggregate grievous sales price of up to $1.0 billion or their U.S. dollar equivalent, from time to time, at their discretion, at the current market price when sold through the Toronto Stock Exchange or the New York Stock Exchange. The ATM program, which is efficacious for a 25-month period, will be activated at their discretion, if and as required, based on the expend profile of TransCanada's capital program and relative cost of other funding options. At June 30, 2017, no common shares were issued under the program.
  • Teleconference and Webcast:

    We will hold a teleconference and webcast on Friday, July 28, 2017 to argue their second quarter 2017 fiscal results. Russ Girling, TransCanada President and Chief Executive Officer, and Don Marchand, Executive Vice-President and Chief fiscal Officer, along with other members of the TransCanada executive leadership team, will argue the fiscal results and Company developments at 9 a.m. (MT) / 11 a.m. (ET).

    Members of the investment community and other interested parties are invited to participate by calling 800.377.0758 or 416.340.2218 (Toronto area). gladden dial in 10 minutes prior to the start of the call. No pass code is required. A live webcast of the teleconference will be available at

    A replay of the teleconference will be available two hours after the conclusion of the muster until midnight (ET) on August 4, 2017. gladden muster 800.408.3053 or 905.694.9451 (Toronto area) and enter pass code 9154252.

    The unaudited interim condensed Consolidated fiscal Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) are available under TransCanada's profile on SEDAR at, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on EDGAR at and on the TransCanada website at

    With more than 65 years' experience, TransCanada is a leader in the accountable evolution and trustworthy operation of North American energy infrastructure including natural gas and liquids pipelines, power generation and gas storage facilities. TransCanada operates a network of natural gas pipelines that extends more than 91,500 kilometres (56,900 miles), tapping into virtually grievous major gas supply basins in North America. TransCanada is the continent's largest provider of gas storage and related services with 653 billion cubic feet of storage capacity. A great independent power producer, TransCanada owns or has interests in approximately 6,200 megawatts of power generation in Canada and the United States. TransCanada is also the developer and operator of one of North America's leading liquids pipeline systems that extends over 4,300 kilometres (2,700 miles) connecting growing continental oil supplies to key markets and refineries. TransCanada's common shares trade on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges under the symbol TRP. Visit and their blog to learn more, or connect with us on social media and 3BL Media.

    Forward Looking Information

    This release contains inescapable information that is forward-looking and is subject to principal risks and uncertainties (such statements are usually accompanied by words such as "anticipate", "expect", "believe", "may", "will", "should", "estimate", "intend" or other similar words). Forward-looking statements in this document are intended to provide TransCanada security holders and potential investors with information regarding TransCanada and its subsidiaries, including management's assessment of TransCanada's and its subsidiaries' future plans and fiscal outlook. grievous forward-looking statements reflect TransCanada's beliefs and assumptions based on information available at the time the statements were made and as such are not guarantees of future performance. Readers are cautioned not to site undue reliance on this forward-looking information, which is given as of the date it is expressed in this intelligence release, and not to utilize future-oriented information or fiscal outlooks for anything other than their intended purpose. TransCanada undertakes no duty to update or revise any forward-looking information except as required by law. For additional information on the assumptions made, and the risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to vary from the anticipated results, advert to the Quarterly Report to Shareholders dated July 27, 2017 and 2016 Annual Report filed under TransCanada's profile on SEDAR at and with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at

    Non-GAAP Measures

    This intelligence release contains references to non-GAAP measures, including comparable earnings, comparable EBITDA, comparable distributable cash flow, comparable funds generated from operations, comparable earnings per participate and comparable distributable cash flow per share, that accomplish not accommodate any standardized meaning as prescribed by U.S. GAAP and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. These non-GAAP measures are calculated on a consistent basis from age to age and are adjusted for specific items in each period, as applicable. For more information on non-GAAP measures, advert to TransCanada's Quarterly Report to Shareholders dated July 27, 2017.

    Quarterly report to shareholders

    Second quarter 2017

    Financial highlights

    three months endedJune 30 six months endedJune 30 (unaudited - millions of $, except per participate amounts) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Income Revenues 3,217 2,751 6,608 5,254 Net income attributable to common shares 881 365 1,524 617 per common participate - basic $1.01 $0.52 $1.76 $0.88 - diluted $1.01 $0.52 $1.75 $0.88 Comparable EBITDA1 1,830 1,369 3,807 2,871 Comparable earnings1 659 366 1,357 860 per common share1 $0.76 $0.52 $1.56 $1.22 Cash flows Net cash provided by operations 1,353 1,148 2,655 2,229 Comparable funds generated from operations1 1,408 1,056 2,916 2,305 Comparable distributable cash flow1 936 702 2,158 1,676 per common share1 $1.08 $1.00 $2.49 $2.38 Capital spending - capital expenditures 1,792 982 3,352 1,818 - projects in development 56 90 98 157 - contributions to equity investments 473 114 665 284 Acquisitions, net of cash acquired - 4 - 999 Proceeds from sales of assets, net of transaction costs 4,147 - 4,147 6 Dividends declared Per common share $0.625 $0.565 $1.25 $1.13 Basic common shares outstanding (millions) Average for the period 870 703 868 703 End of period 871 703 871 703 (1) Comparable EBITDA, comparable earnings, comparable earnings per common share, comparable funds generated from operations, comparable distributable cash flow and comparable distributable cash flow per common participate are grievous non-GAAP measures. note the non-GAAP measures section for more information.

    Management's discussion and analysis

    July 27, 2017

    This management's discussion and analysis (MD&A) contains information to encourage the reader create investment decisions about TransCanada Corporation. It discusses their business, operations, fiscal position, risks and other factors for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, and should be read with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated fiscal statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 which accommodate been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

    This MD&A should also be read in conjunction with their December 31, 2016 audited consolidated fiscal statements and notes and the MD&A in their 2016 Annual Report.


    We disclose forward-looking information to encourage current and potential investors understand management's assessment of their future plans and fiscal outlook, and their future prospects overall.

    Statements that are forward-looking are based on inescapable assumptions and on what they know and expect today and generally involve words like anticipate, expect, believe, may, will, should, estimate or other similar words.

    Forward-looking statements in this MD&A involve information about the following, among other things:

  • planned changes in their business
  • our fiscal and operational performance, including the performance of their subsidiaries
  • expectations or projections about strategies and goals for growth and expansion
  • expected cash flows and future financing options available to us
  • expected dividend growth
  • expected costs for planned projects, including projects under construction, permitting and in development
  • expected schedules for planned projects (including anticipated construction and completion dates)
  • expected regulatory processes and outcomes
  • expected impact of regulatory outcomes
  • expected outcomes with respect to legal proceedings, including arbitration and insurance claims
  • expected capital expenditures and contractual obligations
  • expected operating and fiscal results
  • expected impact of future accounting changes, commitments and contingent liabilities
  • expected industry, market and economic conditions.
  • Forward-looking statements accomplish not guarantee future performance. Actual events and results could be significantly different because of assumptions, risks or uncertainties related to their industry or events that happen after the date of this MD&A.

    Our forward-looking information is based on the following key assumptions, and subject to the following risks and uncertainties:


  • inflation rates, commodity prices and capacity prices
  • nature and scope of hedging
  • regulatory decisions and outcomes
  • foreign exchange rates
  • interest rates
  • tax rates
  • planned and unplanned outages and the utilize of their pipeline and energy assets
  • integrity and reliability of their assets
  • access to capital markets
  • anticipated construction costs, schedules and completion dates.
  • Risks and uncertainties

  • our faculty to realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisition of Columbia
  • our faculty to successfully implement their strategic initiatives
  • whether their strategic initiatives will succumb the expected benefits
  • the operating performance of their pipeline and energy assets
  • amount of capacity sold and rates achieved in their pipeline businesses
  • the availability and price of energy commodities
  • the amount of capacity payments and revenues they receive from their energy business
  • regulatory decisions and outcomes
  • outcomes of legal proceedings, including arbitration and insurance claims
  • performance and credit risk of their counterparties
  • changes in market commodity prices
  • changes in the political environment
  • changes in environmental and other laws and regulations
  • competitive factors in the pipeline and energy sectors
  • construction and completion of capital projects
  • costs for labour, paraphernalia and materials
  • access to capital markets
  • interest, tax and foreign exchange rates
  • weather
  • cyber security
  • technological developments
  • economic conditions in North America as well as globally.
  • You can read more about these factors and others in reports they accommodate filed with Canadian securities regulators and the SEC, including the MD&A in their 2016 Annual Report.

    As actual results could vary significantly from the forward-looking information, you should not build undue reliance on forward-looking information and should not utilize future-oriented information or fiscal outlooks for anything other than their intended purpose. They accomplish not update their forward-looking statements due to new information or future events, unless they are required to by law.


    You can find more information about TransCanada in their annual information configuration and other disclosure documents, which are available on SEDAR (


    This MD&A references the following non-GAAP measures:

  • comparable earnings
  • comparable earnings per common share
  • comparable EBITDA
  • comparable EBIT
  • funds generated from operations
  • comparable funds generated from operations
  • comparable distributable cash flow
  • comparable distributable cash flow per common share.
  • These measures accomplish not accommodate any standardized meaning as prescribed by U.S. GAAP and therefore may not be similar to measures presented by other entities.

    Comparable measures

    We compute comparable measures by adjusting inescapable GAAP and non-GAAP measures for specific items they believe are significant but not reflective of their underlying operations in the period. These comparable measures are calculated on a consistent basis from age to age and are adjusted for specific items in each period, as applicable.

    Our determination not to adjust for a specific detail is subjective and made after observant consideration. Specific items may include:

  • certain equitable value adjustments relating to risk management activities
  • income tax refunds and adjustments and changes to enacted tax rates
  • gains or losses on sales of assets
  • legal, contractual and bankruptcy settlements
  • impact of regulatory or arbitration decisions relating to prior year earnings
  • restructuring costs
  • impairment of goodwill, investments and other assets including inescapable ongoing maintenance and liquidation costs
  • acquisition costs.
  • We exclude the unrealized gains and losses from changes in the equitable value of derivatives used to reduce their exposure to inescapable fiscal and commodity price risks. These derivatives generally provide efficacious economic hedges, but accomplish not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. As a result, the changes in equitable value are recorded in net income. As these amounts accomplish not accurately reflect the gains and losses that will be realized at settlement, they accomplish not consider them reflective of their underlying operations.

    The following table identifies their non-GAAP measures against their equivalent GAAP measures.

    Comparable measure Original measure comparable earnings net income attributable to common shares comparable earnings per common share net income per common share comparable EBITDA segmented earnings comparable EBIT segmented earnings comparable funds generated from operations net cash provided by operations comparable distributable cash flow net cash provided by operations

    Comparable earnings and comparable earnings per share

    Comparable earnings depict earnings or loss attributable to common shareholders on a consolidated basis adjusted for specific items. Comparable earnings is comprised of segmented earnings, interest expense, AFUDC, interest income and other, income taxes and non-controlling interests adjusted for the specific items. note the Consolidated results section for a reconciliation to net income attributable to common shares.

    Comparable EBIT and comparable EBITDA

    Comparable EBIT represents segmented earnings adjusted for the specific items described above. They utilize comparable EBIT as a measure of their earnings from ongoing operations as it is a useful measure of their performance and an efficacious appliance for evaluating trends in each segment. Comparable EBITDA is calculated the same course as comparable EBIT but excludes the non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization. note the Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures section for a reconciliation to segmented earnings.

    Funds generated from operations and comparable funds generated from operations

    Funds generated from operations reflects net cash provided by operations before changes in operating working capital. They believe it is a useful measure of their consolidated operating cash flow because it does not involve fluctuations from working capital balances, which accomplish not necessarily reflect underlying operations in the same period, and is used to provide a consistent measure of the cash generating performance of their assets. Comparable funds generated from operations is adjusted for the cash impact of specific items preeminent above. note the fiscal condition section for a reconciliation to net cash provided by operations.

    Comparable distributable cash flow and comparable distributable cash flow per share

    We believe comparable distributable cash flow is a useful supplemental measure of performance that defines cash available to common shareholders before capital allocation. Comparable distributable cash flow is defined as comparable funds generated from operations less preferred participate dividends, distributions to non-controlling interests and maintenance capital expenditures. Maintenance capital expenditures are expenditures incurred to maintain their operating capacity, asset integrity and reliability, and involve amounts attributable to their proportionate participate of maintenance capital expenditures on their equity investments. Although they deduct maintenance capital expenditures in determining comparable distributable cash flow, in inescapable of their rate-regulated businesses, maintenance capital expenditures are included in their respective rate bases, on which they earn a regulated revert and retrieve depreciation through future tolls. note the fiscal condition section for a reconciliation to net cash provided by operations.

    Consolidated results - second quarter 2017

    Certain costs previously reported in their Corporate segment are now being reported within the industry segments to better align with how they measure their fiscal performance. 2016 results accommodate been adjusted to reflect this change.

    three months endedJune 30 six months endedJune 30 (unaudited - millions of $, except per participate amounts) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines 305 342 587 614 U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines 401 188 962 455 Mexico Natural Gas Pipelines 120 41 238 86 Liquids Pipelines 251 198 478 410 Energy 645 371 843 245 Corporate (40 ) (24 ) (73 ) (51 ) Total segmented earnings 1,682 1,116 3,035 1,759 Interest expense (524 ) (514 ) (1,024 ) (934 ) Allowance for funds used during construction 121 111 222 212 Interest income and other 89 6 109 106 Income before income taxes 1,368 719 2,342 1,143 Income tax expense (393 ) (274 ) (593 ) (344 ) Net income 975 445 1,749 799 Net income attributable to non-controlling interests (55 ) (52 ) (145 ) (132 ) Net income attributable to controlling interests 920 393 1,604 667 Preferred participate dividends (39 ) (28 ) (80 ) (50 ) Net income attributable to common shares 881 365 1,524 617 Net income per common participate - basic $1.01 $0.52 $1.76 $0.88 - diluted $1.01 $0.52 $1.75 $0.88

    Net income attributable to common shares increased by $516 million and $907 million or $0.49 and $0.88 per participate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016. Net income per common participate in 2017 included the dilutive result of issuing 161 million common shares in 2016.

    The 2017 results included:

  • a $255 million after-tax net gain related to the monetization of their U.S. Northeast power business, which included a $441 million after-tax gain on the sale of TC Hydro in second quarter, an incremental loss of $176 million after tax recorded in second quarter on the sale of the thermal and wind package and $10 million year-to-date of after-tax character costs
  • an after-tax charge of $15 million in second quarter and $39 million year-to-date for integration-related costs associated with the acquisition of Columbia
  • an after-tax charge of $4 million in second quarter and $11 million year-to-date related to the maintenance of Keystone XL assets which is being expensed pending further advancement of the project
  • a $7 million income tax recovery in first quarter related to the realized loss on a third party sale of Keystone XL project assets. A provision for the expected pre-tax loss on these assets was included in their 2015 impairment charge, but the related income tax recoveries could not be recorded until realized.
  • The 2016 results included:

  • a $176 million after-tax impairment charge in first quarter on the carrying value of their Alberta PPAs as a result of their determination to terminate the PPAs
  • a charge of $113 million in second quarter and $139 million year-to-date related to costs associated with the acquisition of Columbia. In second quarter, $109 million related to the dividend equivalent payments on the subscription receipts issued as fragment of the permanent financing of the transaction, $10 million ($36 million year-to-date) related to acquisition costs and $6 million related to interest earned on the subscription receipt funds held in escrow
  • an after-tax charge of $9 million in second quarter and $15 million year-to-date related to Keystone XL costs for the maintenance and liquidation of project assets which are being expensed pending further advancement of the project
  • an after-tax charge of $10 million in second quarter for restructuring charges mainly related to expected future losses under lease commitments. These charges formed fragment of a restructuring initiative, which commenced in 2015, to maximize the effectiveness and efficiency of their existing operations and reduce overall costs
  • an additional $3 million after-tax loss on the sale of TC Offshore which closed on March 31, 2016.
  • Net income in grievous periods included unrealized gains and losses from changes in risk management activities which they exclude, along with the above-noted items, to arrive at comparable earnings.

    Comparable earnings increased by $293 million and $497 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 as discussed below in the reconciliation of net income to comparable earnings.


    three months endedJune 30 six months endedJune 30 (unaudited - millions of $, except per participate amounts) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Net income attributable to common shares 881 365 1,524 617 Specific items (net of tax): Net gain on sales of U.S. Northeast power assets (265 ) - (255 ) - Integration and acquisition related costs - Columbia 15 113 39 139 Keystone XL asset costs 4 9 11 15 Keystone XL income tax recoveries - - (7 ) - Alberta PPA terminations - - - 176 Restructuring costs - 10 - 10 TC Offshore loss on sale - - - 3 Risk management activities1 24 (131 ) 45 (100 ) Comparable earnings 659 366 1,357 860 Net income per common share $1.01 $0.52 $1.76 $0.88 Specific items (net of tax): Net gain on sales of U.S. Northeast power assets (0.30 ) - (0.29 ) - Integration and acquisition related costs - Columbia 0.02 0.16 0.04 0.20 Keystone XL asset costs - 0.01 0.01 0.02 Keystone XL income tax recoveries - - (0.01 ) - Alberta PPA terminations - - - 0.25 Restructuring costs - 0.01 - 0.01 Risk management activities 0.03 (0.18 ) 0.05 (0.14 ) Comparable earnings per common share $0.76 $0.52 $1.56 $1.22 (1) Risk management activities three months endedJune 30 six months endedJune 30 (unaudited - millions of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Canadian Power 3 20 4 7 U.S. Power (94 ) 204 (156 ) 89 Liquids marketing 4 4 4 2 Natural Gas Storage (4 ) - 1 5 Foreign exchange 41 (4 ) 56 49 Income tax attributable to risk management activities 26 (93 ) 46 (52 ) Total unrealized (losses)/gains from risk management activities (24 ) 131 (45 ) 100

    Comparable earnings increased by $293 million or $0.24 per participate for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same age in 2016. This was primarily the net result of:

  • higher contribution from U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines due to incremental earnings from Columbia following the July 1, 2016 acquisition and higher ANR transportation revenues resulting from a FERC-approved rate settlement efficacious August 1, 2016
  • higher earnings from Bruce Power mainly due to higher volumes resulting from fewer planned outage days
  • higher interest expense mainly as a result of debt assumed in the acquisition of Columbia on July 1, 2016 and long-term debt issuances
  • higher contribution from Mexico Natural Gas Pipelines due to earnings from Topolobampo climb in July 2016 and Mazatlán climb in December 2016
  • higher earnings from Liquids Pipelines mainly due to higher volumes.
  • Comparable earnings increased by $497 million or $0.34 per participate for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same age in 2016. This was primarily the net result of:

  • higher contribution from U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines due to incremental earnings from Columbia following the July 1, 2016 acquisition and higher ANR transportation revenues resulting from a FERC-approved rate settlement efficacious August 1, 2016
  • higher interest expense as a result of debt assumed in the acquisition of Columbia on July 1, 2016 and long-term debt issuances
  • higher contribution from Mexico Natural Gas Pipelines due to earnings from Topolobampo climb in July 2016 and Mazatlán climb in December 2016
  • higher earnings from Bruce Power mainly due to higher volumes resulting from fewer planned outage days partially offset by higher interest expense
  • higher earnings from Liquids Pipelines mainly due to higher volumes
  • higher earnings from Western Power following the termination of the Alberta PPAs in March 2016.
  • Comparable earnings per participate in 2017 included the dilutive result of issuing 161 million common shares in 2016.

    Capital Program

    We are developing character projects under their capital program. These long-life infrastructure assets are supported by long-term commercial arrangements with creditworthy counterparties or regulated industry models and are expected to generate significant growth in earnings and cash flow.

    Our capital program consists of approximately $24 billion of near-term projects and approximately $43 billion of medium to longer-term projects. Amounts presented exclude maintenance capital expenditures, capitalized interest and AFUDC. grievous projects are subject to cost adjustments due to market conditions, route refinement, permitting conditions, scheduling and timing of regulatory permits.

    Near-term projects

    at June 30, 2017 Expected in-service date Estimated project cost Carrying value (unaudited - billions of $) Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines Canadian Mainline 2017-2019 0.5 0.2 NGTL System1 2017 2.3 1.2 2018 0.3 - 2019 2.2 0.3 2020 1.9 0.1 2021+ 0.4 - U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines Columbia Gas Leach XPress 2017 US 1.5 US 0.9 Modernization I 2017 US 0.2 US 0.1 WB XPress 2018 US 0.8 US 0.3 Mountaineer XPress 2018 US 2.0 US 0.2 Modernization II 2018-2020 US 1.1 - Columbia Gulf Rayne XPress 2017 US 0.4 US 0.3 Cameron Access 2018 US 0.3 US 0.2 Gulf XPress 2018 US 0.6 US 0.1 Midstream - Gibraltar 2017 US 0.3 US 0.2 Mexico Natural Gas Pipelines Tula 2018 US 0.6 US 0.4 Villa de Reyes 2018 US 0.6 US 0.3 Sur de Texas2 2018 US 1.3 US 0.4 Liquids Pipelines Grand Rapids2 2017 0.9 0.8 Northern Courier 2017 1.0 1.0 White Spruce 2018 0.2 - Energy Napanee 2018 1.1 0.8 Bruce Power - life extension3 up to 2020+ 1.0 0.2 21.5 8.0 Foreign exchange impact on near-term projects4 2.9 1.0 Total near-term projects (billions of Cdn$) 24.4 9.0 (1) As of June 30, 2017, near-term NGTL System capital projects are being reported by expected in-service dates. (2) Our proportionate share. (3) Amounts reflect their proportionate participate of the remaining capital costs that Bruce Power expects to incur on its life extension investment programs in advance of major refurbishment outages which are expected to originate in 2020. (4) Reflects U.S./Canada foreign exchange rate of $1.30 at June 30, 2017.

    Medium to longer-term projects

    The medium to longer-term projects accommodate greater suspicion with respect to timing and estimated project costs. The expected in-service dates of these projects are post-2020, and costs provided in the schedule below reflect the most recent costs for each project as filed with the various regulatory authorities or otherwise determined. These projects accommodate grievous been commercially secured or, in the case of Keystone XL, commercial support is expected to be achieved. grievous these projects are subject to approvals that involve sponsor FID and/or tangled regulatory processes.

    at June 30, 2017 Segment Estimated project cost Carrying value (unaudited - billions of $) Heartland and TC Terminals Liquids Pipelines 0.9 0.1 Upland Liquids Pipelines US 0.6 - Grand Rapids aspect 21 Liquids Pipelines 0.7 - Bruce Power - life extension1 Energy 5.3 - Keystone projects Keystone XL2 Liquids Pipelines US 8.0 US 0.3 Keystone Hardisty Terminal2 Liquids Pipelines 0.3 0.1 Energy East projects Energy East3 Liquids Pipelines 15.7 0.8 Eastern Mainline Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines 2.0 0.1 BC west coast LNG-related projects Coastal GasLink Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines 4.8 0.4 NGTL System - Merrick Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines 1.9 - 40.2 1.8 Foreign exchange impact on medium to longer-term projects4 2.6 0.1 Total medium to longer-term projects (billions of Cdn$) 42.8 1.9 (1) Our proportionate share. (2) Carrying value reflects amount remaining after impairment charge recorded in fourth quarter 2015. (3) Excludes transfer of Canadian Mainline natural gas assets. (4) Reflects U.S./Canada foreign exchange rate of $1.30 at June 30, 2017.


    Our overall comparable earnings outlook for 2017 is expected to be higher than what was previously included in the 2016 Annual Report as a result of stronger performance across their industry segments, including from the U.S. Northeast power industry in first half 2017, as minute in the MD&A.

    Consolidated capital spending

    Our expected total capital expenditures, projects in evolution and contributions to equity investments for 2017 as outlined in the 2016 Annual Report, remain unchanged.

    Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines

    The following is a reconciliation of comparable EBITDA and comparable EBIT (our non-GAAP measures) to segmented earnings (the equivalent GAAP measure). inescapable costs previously reported in their Corporate segment are now being reported within the industry segments to better align with how they measure their fiscal performance. 2016 results accommodate been adjusted to reflect this change.

    ... three months endedJune 30 six months endedJune 30

    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [22 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [128 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [14 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [68 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Vimeo :
    Issu :
    Dropmark :
    Wordpress :
    weSRCH :
    Scribd :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Youtube :
    Blogspot :
    RSS Feed : :
    Google+ :
    Calameo : : : : "Excle"

    Back to Main Page

    Killexams A2040-405 exams | Killexams A2040-405 cert | Pass4Sure A2040-405 questions | Pass4sure A2040-405 | pass-guaratee A2040-405 | best A2040-405 test preparation | best A2040-405 training guides | A2040-405 examcollection | killexams | killexams A2040-405 review | killexams A2040-405 legit | kill A2040-405 example | kill A2040-405 example journalism | kill exams A2040-405 reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review A2040-405 | review A2040-405 quizlet | review A2040-405 login | review A2040-405 archives | review A2040-405 sheet | legitimate A2040-405 | legit A2040-405 | legitimacy A2040-405 | legitimation A2040-405 | legit A2040-405 check | legitimate A2040-405 program | legitimize A2040-405 | legitimate A2040-405 business | legitimate A2040-405 definition | legit A2040-405 site | legit online banking | legit A2040-405 website | legitimacy A2040-405 definition | >pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | A2040-405 material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure A2040-405 exams | pass4sure A2040-405 reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure A2040-405 security | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure A2040-405 dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure A2040-405 braindumps | pass4sure A2040-405 test | pass4sure A2040-405 torrent | pass4sure A2040-405 download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice | | | |